Mapping the potential ranges of major plant invaders in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland using climatic suitability

Abstract

Most national or regional initiatives aimed at managing biological invasions lack objective protocols for prioritizing invasive species and areas based on likely future dimensions of spread. South Africa has one of the most ambitious national programmes for managing plant invasions in the world. There is, however, no protocol for assessing the likely future spread patterns needed to inform medium‐ to long‐term planning. This paper presents an assessment of the climatic correlates of distribution of 71 important invasive alien plants, and an analysis of the implications of these findings for future invasions in different vegetation types in South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland over the next few decades. We used a variant of climatic envelope models (CEMs) based on the Mahalanobis distance to derive climatic suitability surfaces for each species. CEMs were developed using the first three principal components derived from an analysis of seven climatic variables. Most species are currently confined to 10% or less of the region, but could potentially invade up to 40%. Depending on the species, between 2% and 79% of the region is climatically suitable for species to invade, and some areas were suitable for up to 45 plant invaders. Over one third of the modelled species have limited potential to substantially expand their distribution. About 20% of the vegetation types have low invasion potential where fewer than five species can invade, and about 10% have high invasion potential, being potentially suitable for more than 25 of the plant invaders. Our results suggest that management of the invasive plant species that are currently most widespread should focus on reducing densities, for example through biological control programmes, rather than controlling range expansions. We also identify areas of the region that may require additional management focus in the future.

Temporal biodiversity change in transformed landscapes: a southern African perspective

“…This outcome is in keeping with a global assessment of the consequences of ungulate introductions, where impacts on vegetation are often substantial (Spear & Chown 2009b). Erasmus et al 2002;van Rensburg et al 2002;Rouget et al 2004;Richardson et al 2005;Evans et al 2006b;Mucina & Rutherford 2006;Thuiller et al 2006a). Changes in these variables (as well as in composites such as evapotranspiration) therefore should have large influences on species distributions and on species richness in the region, and many forecast-based studies suggest that this is likely to be the case (Erasmus et al 2002;Hannah et al 2005;Thuiller et al 2006b,c;Coetzee et al 2009, but see also Keith et al 2008).…”

Predicting the potential distributions of Senecio vulgaris L. in China

“…From a management point of view, it is extremely important to identify area which is not yet invaded but where early warning detection and control programs are essential to implement. Recent studies have developed niche-based models to assess the suitability of a region for a given species and its potential to spread throughout (Jimenez-Valverde et al 2011;Petterson 2003;Rouget et al 2004;Thuiller et al 2005). …”

Toward a new instrument for identifying the Italian hotspots of biodiversity: A case study of the amphibians and reptiles of Sicily

“…In recent decades ever-more sophisticated Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies, as well as novel geostatistic procedures were developed and increasingly utilized in a very large spectrum of studies (e.g. Guisan & Zimmermann 2000;Rouget et al 2004;Bombi et al 2009bBombi et al , 2009d. These methodologies rapidly became extremely helpful instruments for biodiversity conservation, because these procedures make possible the production of exhaustive maps representing the presence/absence of the target species point-by-point across the entire area of interest.…”