2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the parent austenite orientation reconstructed from the orientation of martensite by EBSD and its application to ausformed martensite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The [14]. Therefore, it is possible to identify the crystallographic orientation of γ grain based on EBSD analysis of the martensite structure [15,16]. According to the K-S relationship [14], 24 different variants of martensite are possible to form in a γ grain.…”
Section: Crystallographic Relationship Between Dendrite and As-cast γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The [14]. Therefore, it is possible to identify the crystallographic orientation of γ grain based on EBSD analysis of the martensite structure [15,16]. According to the K-S relationship [14], 24 different variants of martensite are possible to form in a γ grain.…”
Section: Crystallographic Relationship Between Dendrite and As-cast γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic analytical method is borrowed from the PTMC, 14 which provides the equation for the unextended cone based on B. On this cone, usually two equivalent solutions for the possible invariant normal can be derived using Equation (1). As shown in Figure 5b, numerous O-line interfaces can be determined for a specific invariant normal.…”
Section: /2′mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental characterisation of crystallographic information has been facilitated by advances in electron microscopy, especially the development of the electron backscatter diffraction technique. [1][2][3] Computer simulations of microstructures generated from solid-state phase transformations have also achieved a certain degree of success. [4][5][6][7][8] The orientations of the predicted faceted interfaces are a key parameter that can be used to check whether a simulated morphology actually resembles what is observed in a real material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reconstruction program developed in the previous study, 19) an α orientation map measured by EBSD at a certain step size is analyzed. The measured data set of α orientations in a small mesh, of which edge length is L1, are here represented by the orientation matrix, M (2) where N is the number of data in a single mesh.…”
Section: Reconstruction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assume a rational orientation relationship (OR) between the parent and product phases, such as Kurdjumov-Sachs or Nishiyama-Wasserman relationships for fcc to bcc transformation, then calculate the orientation of the parent phase. In contrast, the present authors 19) have recently developed a new program to reconstruct a γ orientation map based on an orientation map of bcc martensite, in which an OR between γ and martensite is assumed to have non-parallel relations in close-packed planes and directions. 20) The same program was applied to ausformed martensite, and a deformed γ structure was successfully visualized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%