2017
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1393800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Occupation: Performativity and the Precarious Israeli Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are often not archived and are not passed on to army intelligence. 126 According to one former Israeli soldier, the 'mappings were designed to make the Palestinians feel that we were there all the time … I had the pictures [I had taken] for around a month … [N]o commander asked about them, no intelligence officer took them … At one point I deleted the pictures, I realized it was all a joke.' 127 What is the point then of such operations?…”
Section: Key Results Of the Oslo Regime: Jurisdiction And Governance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are often not archived and are not passed on to army intelligence. 126 According to one former Israeli soldier, the 'mappings were designed to make the Palestinians feel that we were there all the time … I had the pictures [I had taken] for around a month … [N]o commander asked about them, no intelligence officer took them … At one point I deleted the pictures, I realized it was all a joke.' 127 What is the point then of such operations?…”
Section: Key Results Of the Oslo Regime: Jurisdiction And Governance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as Said's (1978) concept of “orientalism” probes, colonialism is a system of power–knowledge, through which the “Orient” emerges as a site and object of Western imagination—involving an infatuation with the East as exotic but also underdeveloped to justify imperial domination. Accordingly, Zionism imagined itself as Western vis vis‐à‐vis the reduction of Palestinians as “primitive”; simultaneously trying to emulate and appropriate the Palestinian indigeneity to assert its claim for nativity (Guez 2015; Huss 2019). Following the 1948 war, Israel deployed “classic” settler‐colonial apparatuses to nationalise the dispossessed Palestinian land and property and populate Jews in “frontier” regions (and replicated this process after 1967 in the Occupied Palestinian Territories) (Benvenisti 2002; Yacobi and Tzfadia 2019; Yiftachel 2009).…”
Section: Between Neo‐settler‐colonial Violence Urban Displacement And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falah 2004;Griffiths 2017;Hammami 2016); and the manifold 'slow-motion' bureaucratic means by which the Israeli Civil Administration maintains Palestinians' precarity (Berda 2017;Joronen 2017). In the context of families and the occupation of Palestine, scholars have further documented how Israeli officials construct the Palestinian family as nuclear so as to make surveillance more effective (Zureik 2001, 219), and the ways that family members of each household are frequently photographed and mapped by the Israeli Army (Huss 2017). Additional work has identified the family as the locus of the more extreme forms of colonial violence, from house demolition and deportation to collective punishment, checkpoint restrictions and denial of reunification (Griffiths and Repo 2018;Shalhoub-Kevorkian 2012).…”
Section: Slow-motion Government Bureaucracy and Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%