2019
DOI: 10.3390/land8030051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Loss of Ecosystem Services in a Region Under Intensive Land Use Along the Southern Coast of South Africa

Abstract: Intensive land use activities worldwide have caused considerable loss to many ecosystem services. The dynamics of these threats must be quickly investigated to ensure timely update of management strategies and policies. Compared with complex models, mapping approaches that use scoring matrices to link land use/land cover and landscape properties with ecosystem services are relatively efficient and easier to apply. In this study, scoring matrices are developed and spatially explicit assessments of five ecosyste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the human population in sub-Saharan Africa depends directly or indirectly on the goods and services provided by biodiversity (Shackleton et al 2008; Egoh et al 2012), including clean water, soil productivity, firewood/charcoal, game animals, and medicinal plants (Daily & others 1997; Postel et al 2012) – nature’s contributions to people (Díaz et al 2018; Brondizio et al 2019). However, many of these services are being degraded through habitat loss and transformation, exacerbated by rapid urbanization, agricultural expansion, ‘land grabbing’ by foreign nations for food and biofuel production, and climate change (Egoh et al 2012; Malherbe et al 2019). The poor, and rural communities, tend to be most impacted by losses of ecosystem services as they frequently lack alternatives (Hope Sr 2007; United Nation Economic Commission for Africa 2010; Egoh et al 2012; Kumar & Yashiro 2014), while poverty is a major underlying contributor to environmental degradation (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987; Olanipekun et al 2019), although the relationship is complex (Barbier & Hochard 2018).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the human population in sub-Saharan Africa depends directly or indirectly on the goods and services provided by biodiversity (Shackleton et al 2008; Egoh et al 2012), including clean water, soil productivity, firewood/charcoal, game animals, and medicinal plants (Daily & others 1997; Postel et al 2012) – nature’s contributions to people (Díaz et al 2018; Brondizio et al 2019). However, many of these services are being degraded through habitat loss and transformation, exacerbated by rapid urbanization, agricultural expansion, ‘land grabbing’ by foreign nations for food and biofuel production, and climate change (Egoh et al 2012; Malherbe et al 2019). The poor, and rural communities, tend to be most impacted by losses of ecosystem services as they frequently lack alternatives (Hope Sr 2007; United Nation Economic Commission for Africa 2010; Egoh et al 2012; Kumar & Yashiro 2014), while poverty is a major underlying contributor to environmental degradation (World Commission on Environment and Development 1987; Olanipekun et al 2019), although the relationship is complex (Barbier & Hochard 2018).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This independence given by the survey methods allowed for development of a simple matrix linking ecosystem status categories with URES via weighting factors ( Table 3). The assessment of ecosystem services based on land cover respectively habitats by matrices is a commonly used method [51][52][53]. New in this work is that the matrix from Table 3 translates not only land cover but also water quality and hydromorphological quality into the potential to provide ecosystem services.…”
Section: Links Between Ures and Ecosystem Status Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other commonly used methods include the limit condition method, fuzzy clustering analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical analysis, multi-factor comprehensive evaluation, evaluation methods based on the pressure, state and response (PSR) model or the remote sensing images, stochastic frontier analysis, genetic algorithm, and BP neural network, etc. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Based on the concept of sustainable intensification and ecological constraints, Qian et al developed a sustainable intensification variable model to conduct a moderately intensive land use evaluation in Jinan City, China [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Shi and Huang analysed the relationship between land morphological characteristics and land-use intensity in Shanghai development zones [10]. Malherbe et al examined the effect of intensive land use activities on loss to ecosystem services in South Africa [42]. Goertzen and Suhling investigated the effect of different landscapes (urban, agricultural or more natural landscapes) or land use intensity on biodiversity in Germany [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%