2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2013.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the global minima of binary Morse clusters: The effects of range mismatch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aggregation of different types of particles is expected to increase the diversity of the arising structures. This has been observed in several binary systems and, in particular, when combining Morse clusters of different ranges . Conversely, we have shown that combining very short-ranged (e.g., ρ = 25 and ρ = 30) Morse potentials, having one of the components in excess, does not lead to binary clusters with significantly different global minimum structures .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The aggregation of different types of particles is expected to increase the diversity of the arising structures. This has been observed in several binary systems and, in particular, when combining Morse clusters of different ranges . Conversely, we have shown that combining very short-ranged (e.g., ρ = 25 and ρ = 30) Morse potentials, having one of the components in excess, does not lead to binary clusters with significantly different global minimum structures .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…As far as chemical order is now concerned, all clusters exhibit a clear core/shell phase separation, consistently with our previous analysis. 35 At the present size and composition, there are not enough B particles to coat the core of A particles completely, and several long-range particles are on the outside. The detailed chemical order is rather sensitive to the range, as illustrated by the two clusters with medium or short-range interactions [6;9] and [5.9;6.1], which share a common close-packed structure but slightly differ in the most stable homotop.…”
Section: A Binary Morse Clustersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Following previous works 34, 35 we set both D and r 0 to unity for all A-A, A-B, and B-B interactions, and a simple combination rule ρ AB = (ρ A + ρ B )/2 for the range of the mixed interaction, given the ranges ρ A and ρ B of the two alike pairs. The clusters are thus characterized by the pair of ranges, denoted as [ρ A ;ρ B ] with ρ A < ρ B , and chosen from the three series [ρ;12 − ρ] and [ρ;6] with ρ = 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 5.7, 5.9, as well as [6;ρ] with ρ = 6.1, 6.3, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9. Relative to the LJ interaction that is equivalent to ρ = 6 and considered to be medium ranged, ranges lower (higher) than 6 will be denoted as long (short).…”
Section: A Binary Morse Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The possibility of fine-tuning their properties is enhanced when both size and composition are varied. However, the structural characterization, necessary for a precise understanding of their properties, becomes a problem, since the enormous amount of structural conformations of a pure cluster is significantly increased by the combinatorial possibilities of binary ones [1][2][3]. Therefore, the search for minimal energy configurations has to be approached following a strategy that i) insures the diversity of the local minimal energy conformations, that is, how many non-equivalent configurations are obtained as the two species are mixed; and, ii) balances reasonable computation times and the "certainty" of not loosing potentially important conformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%