2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the dynamic repertoire of the resting brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in reality, there is an alternative effective connectivity structure that links to and to with the original more complex relationship. Whilst it has been shown that there can still exist a wide repertoire of functional networks [81] , we might reasonably expect differences across cohorts to become apparent in resting-state functional networks at the group level. The inherent variability in functional expression may reflect the overlap between the patient cohort and the control cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in reality, there is an alternative effective connectivity structure that links to and to with the original more complex relationship. Whilst it has been shown that there can still exist a wide repertoire of functional networks [81] , we might reasonably expect differences across cohorts to become apparent in resting-state functional networks at the group level. The inherent variability in functional expression may reflect the overlap between the patient cohort and the control cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method utilized k-means clustering analysis, which iteratively combined nested high spatial-correlation topographies and identified a representative topography that best explained the variance in each cluster. Various methods of clustering, such as agglomerative hierarchical clustering [ 65 ], principal component analysis [ 66 , 67 ], independent component analysis [ 68 ], a mixture of Gaussian algorithms [ 69 ], and Markov process-based decomposition [ 70 , 71 ], recently developed for factor analysis, can be used to segment the most dominant spatial components in series of topography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microstates are determined post hoc by fitting the cluster maps back to the data (see below). Several alternative methods for cluster or factor analysis can be used to determine the most dominant spatial components in map series, such as agglomerative hierarchical clustering (Murray et al, 2008), principal component analysis (Pourtois et al, 2008;Skrandies, 1989;Spencer et al, 2001), independent component analysis (Makeig et al, 2004;Makeig et al, 1999), a mixture of Gaussian algorithms (De Lucia et al, 2007), or decomposition based on Markov processes (Hadriche et al, 2013). These methods all aim to identify subcomponents of the data that are considered to be unrelated, but they differ with regard to the mathematical definitions of "unrelated."…”
Section: 1spatial Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%