2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12233933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Distribution of Coffee Plantations from Multi-Resolution, Multi-Temporal, and Multi-Sensor Data Using a Random Forest Algorithm

Abstract: Indonesia is the world’s fourth largest coffee producer. Coffee plantations cover 1.2 million ha of the country with a production of 500 kg/ha. However, information regarding the distribution of coffee plantations in Indonesia is limited. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of classification model and determine its important variables for mapping coffee plantations. The model obtained 29 variables which derived from the integration of multi-resolution, multi-temporal, and multi-sensor remote sensing data, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(122 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reviewed in Section 2.3, TCT coefficients have not been published for atmospherically corrected S2 imagery, and Landsat's surface reflectance coefficients [96] do not cover all S2 bands. Whereas certain authors have used at-sensor-derived coefficients on surface reflectance S2 imagery [87][88][89][90][91], in a multi-temporal change application, the ever-changing effects of atmosphere result in inconsistent indices of brightness, greenness, and wetness that are directly a result of fluctuating atmospheric conditions. Although the exact effects onto index values such as dDI are not fully understood, Crist et al [42] suggests that changing atmospheric conditions will alter subsequent results derived from TCT indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reviewed in Section 2.3, TCT coefficients have not been published for atmospherically corrected S2 imagery, and Landsat's surface reflectance coefficients [96] do not cover all S2 bands. Whereas certain authors have used at-sensor-derived coefficients on surface reflectance S2 imagery [87][88][89][90][91], in a multi-temporal change application, the ever-changing effects of atmosphere result in inconsistent indices of brightness, greenness, and wetness that are directly a result of fluctuating atmospheric conditions. Although the exact effects onto index values such as dDI are not fully understood, Crist et al [42] suggests that changing atmospheric conditions will alter subsequent results derived from TCT indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some authors [85,86] have used coefficients developed for Landsat at-sensor reflectance products on S2 level-2A imagery. Others [87][88][89][90][91] have applied TCT coefficients to S2 level-2A data that were developed for at-sensor S2 (level-1C) imagery [43,92]. The spectral range and similarities of bands from Landsat and S2 bands are well documented [93][94][95], and the coefficients as developed by Crist [96] have been used in various studies using surface reflectance Landsat imagery [51,[97][98][99].…”
Section: Index Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of information from satellite data and field data is used as a basis for preparing training data that will subsequently become input in the classification model [84]. The training data process and RF classification in this study were performed using the Vigra tool contained in the open-source software SAGA 7.6.2 [85,86], with a total amount of training data of 1135 pixels for Landsat-7 ETM+ and 1285 pixels for Landsat-8 OLI. For the initial stage, we performed tuning on several parameters, including the number of trees, the number of predictor variables (mtry), and minimum node size to obtain optimal mangrove and non-mangrove classification models.…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the initial stage, we performed tuning on several parameters, including the number of trees, the number of predictor variables (mtry), and minimum node size to obtain optimal mangrove and non-mangrove classification models. This study used the number of trees of as much as 100, 500, and 1000 [87][88][89], mtry = √ k (square root) and mtry = k (all variables) [45,86], and a minimum node size of 6. The application of the RF algorithm in previous studies with the parameters of the number of trees = 1000, mtry = all, and minimum node size = 6 produces an overall accuracy of 79.333% with a kappa statistic of 0.774 in mapping the distribution of coffee plantations [86].…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, mapping coffee plantations is critical for determining the geographic locations of coffee production hubs. When it comes to monitoring and mapping vegetation, remote sensing technology has been extensively shown to be a cost-effective, rapid, and efficient approach [10], [11]. Additionally, the use of machine learning to remote sensing analysis seeks to enhance the lives of coffee farmworkers and their families, boost the productivity of current coffee production regions, and avert either forest clearance or depletion of other natural resources [7], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%