2020
DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfaa045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Discursive Study of Religion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second and most important aspect of a genealogical approach is that it shows the interdependence between concepts and categories (the labeling and objectifying power of language) and the social phenomena they address. In other words, the genealogical method acknowledges the productive power of language and discourse to create that of which they speak (Hjelm 2020;Moberg 2013;von Stuckrad 2013;Taira 2013Taira , 2016. As Granholm (2011, 787) correctly notes, building on Hanegraaff's seminal work on esotericism: "A researcher interested in doing sociological studies on esotericism [or on contemporary spiritualities and yoga for that matter] does well to bear in mind that the esotericism of academic research is a scholarly construct; in Hanegraaff's words, it is 'not "discovered" but produced' (Hanegraaff 1998, p. 16).…”
Section: The Genealogical Approach and The Discursive Study Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and most important aspect of a genealogical approach is that it shows the interdependence between concepts and categories (the labeling and objectifying power of language) and the social phenomena they address. In other words, the genealogical method acknowledges the productive power of language and discourse to create that of which they speak (Hjelm 2020;Moberg 2013;von Stuckrad 2013;Taira 2013Taira , 2016. As Granholm (2011, 787) correctly notes, building on Hanegraaff's seminal work on esotericism: "A researcher interested in doing sociological studies on esotericism [or on contemporary spiritualities and yoga for that matter] does well to bear in mind that the esotericism of academic research is a scholarly construct; in Hanegraaff's words, it is 'not "discovered" but produced' (Hanegraaff 1998, p. 16).…”
Section: The Genealogical Approach and The Discursive Study Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before moving on, it is important to say that "the discursive study of religion" is not one thing, but is rather best seen as a collection of different positions (Hjelm 2020). It could be argued, however, that what they all share in common is their connection to the work of Michel Foucualt (see von Stuckrad 2015: 2).…”
Section: Schilbrack's Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologically, the article relies on discourse analysis of three yoga manuals and on twenty-seven anonymized biographical interviews of Italian yoga teachers and practitioners (2017-2020) conducted as part of a broader ethnographic project on the pedagogies of modern yoga (2017-present). Discourse analysis, approached through a variety of theoretical sensitivities, has been widely applied to the study of religious discourses and phenomena (Asad 1993;Beaman 2020;Hjelm 2020;Johnston and von Stuckrad 2020;Qadir 2023), showing the socially and discursively constructed nature of concepts, practices and ideologies central to the disciplines comprising the social scientific study of religion. In this article, I build on this critical tradition and apply it to the study of situated discourses and of how language "simultaneously reflects and constructs the situation or context in which it is used" (Gee [1999(Gee [ ] 2014.…”
Section: Discourse and Practice In The Social Scientific Study Of Rel...mentioning
confidence: 99%