1995
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1087:mtaogs>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the architecture of glaciofluvial sediments with three-dimensional georadar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of the GPR profiles is based on (i) continuity of the dominant reflectors within and between the profiles, (ii) differences of reflection patterns, and (iii) angular unconformity between the reflectors that can indicate an erosion surface or the superposition of two sedimentary structures with different sedimentary textures (Beres et al, 1995(Beres et al, , 1999. Three GPR profiles image three relatively well-preserved, overlapping trough fill structures that are identified by their erosional lower-bounding surfaces.…”
Section: Ground-penetrating Radar Data Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interpretation of the GPR profiles is based on (i) continuity of the dominant reflectors within and between the profiles, (ii) differences of reflection patterns, and (iii) angular unconformity between the reflectors that can indicate an erosion surface or the superposition of two sedimentary structures with different sedimentary textures (Beres et al, 1995(Beres et al, , 1999. Three GPR profiles image three relatively well-preserved, overlapping trough fill structures that are identified by their erosional lower-bounding surfaces.…”
Section: Ground-penetrating Radar Data Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, coarse, braided river deposits are composed of two main depositional elements, remnants of gravel sheets (Huber and Huggenberger, 2015) and trough fills with clear-cut erosional lower-bounding surfaces (e.g. Siegenthaler and Huggenberger, 1993;Jussel et al, 1994a;Beres et al, 1995Beres et al, , 1999Rauber et al, 1998;Stauffer and Rauber, 1998;Teutsch et al, 1998;Anderson et al, 1999;Klingbeil et al, 1999;Whittaker and Teutsch, 1999;Huggenberger and Regli, 2006;Bayer et al, 2011). The sedimentary structure of the remnants of gravel sheets consists of horizontal to sub-horizontal layers with a poorly sorted gravel texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum size of the summed area depends on the radiation pattem and the area of the first Fresnel zone of the chosen antennas. THE 3-D DATA SET One of our 3-D data sets was acquired from a glaciofluvial environment characterized by braided river deposits (Beres et aL, 1995). By combining information derived from time slices and cross sections it is possible to quickly interpret structural variations with travel time (depth).…”
Section: The Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigations have shown the potential of three dimensional georadar measurements in different applications of near-surface geophysics (Beres et al, 1995;Grasmück and Green, 1996;Grasmück, 1996). Unfortunately, acquiring 3-D georadar data is usually time-consuming and therefore Cost intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the possibilities offered by the GPR to investigate the subsoil in a non-invasively way, and to obtain 3D maps of the subsurface itself, becomes of crucial importance for geologists. The successful obtained by GPR investigations on sedimentary rock stratigraphy is well documented in literature (Annan and Davis, 1989;van Overmeeren, 1998;Mills and Speece, 1997;Mokma et al, 1990;Nobes et al, 2001;Lapen et al, 1996;Baker, 1991;Beres, et al, 1995;Leucci et al, 2000;Carrozzo et al, 2000;Carrozzo et al, 2003). Since GPR holds enormous potential for such studies, it is appropriate to assess some key considerations for, i) field data acquisition, ii) raw data processing in order to enhance data display, iii) EM wave velocity measurements in order to characterize sediments response and to perform the time to depth conversion, iv) lithological interpretation of the GPR data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%