2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping terrestrial -dose rate in Europe based on routine monitoring data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first tested the effect of the change of large scale transport using tagged simulations from 30 • × 30 • regions over Europe to determine the so called foot print or catchment area of the site. Enhanced emissions in southwestern Europe (Szegvary et al, 2007(Szegvary et al, , 2009 (Dörr and Münnich, 1990), consistent with the seasonality in modelled mismatch. This seasonality is thought to be driven by changes in soil moisture, which could also provide a mechanism for interannual changes in radon flux.…”
Section: Emissionssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first tested the effect of the change of large scale transport using tagged simulations from 30 • × 30 • regions over Europe to determine the so called foot print or catchment area of the site. Enhanced emissions in southwestern Europe (Szegvary et al, 2007(Szegvary et al, , 2009 (Dörr and Münnich, 1990), consistent with the seasonality in modelled mismatch. This seasonality is thought to be driven by changes in soil moisture, which could also provide a mechanism for interannual changes in radon flux.…”
Section: Emissionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Various 222 Rn flux distributions have been proposed including an exhalation rate distribution based on multiple factors, such as radium content in the soil, grain size of the soil (Schery and Wasiolek, 1998) a flux distribution with a decrease with latitude north of 30 • N (Connen and Robertson, 2002), and a spatially and temporally resolved exhalation rate map over Europe using gamma dose rate (Szegvary et al, 2007(Szegvary et al, , 2009. A flux distribution over ocean was estimated using radium content in the sea-water and wind speed dependency of the gas transfer velocity between air and the sea (Schery and Huang, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probe related information provided by the network operators to AIRDOS is derived from the results of the EURADOS inter-comparison exercises and the Schauinsland inter-calibration site. Szegvary [13] applied corrections to the EURDEP data based on the AIRDOS: self-effect-corrections, correction of the cosmic radiation with empirical functions depending on the altitude asl; subtraction of the artificial radiation (mostly derived from the Chernobyl accident 1986); geometry of the measurement (e.g. height above ground).…”
Section: Adjusting Network For the Validation Of Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where applicable, an artificial component from 137 Cs was subtracted based on data in de Cort et al [1]. Kriging methods developed within INTAMAP project are used for spatial interpolation between monitoring stations provided European maps of terrestrial GDR [13], which have then been transformed in 222 Rn flux maps for use in atmospheric transport applications using the empirical relation between terrestrial GDR and 222 Rn flux described in Szegvary et al [5]. These maps are available at http://radon.unibas.ch/.…”
Section: Adjusting Network For the Validation Of Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combine the emissions from an improved version of the high-resolution emission model of the (Szegvary et al, 2007), with the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model transport Bringing together results from different research communities, this study especially aims at illustrating how combining information from different fields, i.e. emissions estimates, regional modelling and observations, including tracers for source apportionment or atmospheric mixing, can increase our understanding of the future challenges that will have to be jointly addressed by the different research communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%