2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Sub-Second Structure in Mouse Behavior

Abstract: Summary Complex animal behaviors are likely built from simpler modules, but their systematic identification in mammals remains a significant challenge. Here we use depth imaging to show that three-dimensional (3D) mouse pose dynamics are structured at the sub-second timescale. Computational modeling of these fast dynamics effectively describes mouse behavior as a series of reused and stereotyped modules with defined transition probabilities. We demonstrate this combined 3D imaging and machine learning method c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
765
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 633 publications
(805 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
765
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Wiltschko et al (2015) fit a hidden Markov model directly to the data instead of inferring it after clustering as we have done. Thus, their optimization is simultaneously on the Markovian transitions between states as well as the shape of the states themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example Wiltschko et al (2015) fit a hidden Markov model directly to the data instead of inferring it after clustering as we have done. Thus, their optimization is simultaneously on the Markovian transitions between states as well as the shape of the states themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) This data then undergoes pre-processing and may be dimensionally expanded using time frequency analysis to capture postural dynamics (e.g. Berman et al 2014 andWiltschko et al 2015). (3) Dimensionality reduction is employed to facilitate subsequent computational steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…behavioral states). While the standard GLM framework can still accommodate these cases (Pillow et al 2008;Fründ et al 2014), more complex types of non-stationarities affecting the stimulus response mapping can be modelled by combining LNs with hidden Markov models (HMM), in which the HMM models the switching between states and one LN model per state captures state-specific input-output transformations ( (Escola et al 2011), see (Wiltschko et al 2015) for a related approach).…”
Section: Extensions Of the Standard Linear-nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational models applied to such data will facilitate both interpreting population neural activity and connecting neural activity with behavior. In parallel, the use of unsupervised classification methods has revealed stereotyped structure in animal behavior -an animal's movements over time can be described as sequences of discrete behavioral modules (Vogelstein et al 2014;Berman et al 2014;Wiltschko et al 2015). Computational modeling's task will now be to determine how sensory cues and internal states affect behavioral sequencing, and how neural codes underlie the choice of behavioral modules.…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we may search for inspiration from recent machine-learning-based classification of mouse behaviour, indicating that movements are combinations of different elementary movements, subsecond postures of mouse body language which form 'syllables', like those in language [64].…”
Section: Current Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%