Mapping space‐based systems engineering curriculum to government‐industry vetted competencies for improved organizational performance

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a method that can be used to analyze the degree to which an organization's systems engineering capabilities meet government‐industry defined systems engineering needs. To demonstrate this process, using universities as the case study, we summarize secondary research completed for nine institutions from various countries that offer systems engineering graduate level programs in the space domain. Next, we select a Masters degree program from three universities, one from each country, and map their space‐based systems engineering courses to the 37 systems engineering capabilities within the 10 systems engineering competencies. These capabilities represent the knowledge, skills, and behaviors that systems engineers are expected to possess and perform as a part of their job. We then review a process for a more detailed mapping of the curriculum to one of four levels of proficiency within each capability, using the Stevens Institute of Technology as the example. The result is a systems engineering competency‐based approach that can be used by universities or companies to compare the “as is” state of their systems engineering capabilities development against a government‐industry defined set of needs to identify and address gaps or opportunities in the curriculum, training, or experience of their students and/or employees. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Competencies required for successful acquisition of the Next Generation Air Transportation System

“…A Stevens analysis of competencies for space systems [5] brings in additional detail relating to requirements such as needs statements and operational environment. It also includes systems assurance as a separate topic.…”

5.4.2 Competencies Required for Successful Acquisition of Large, Highly Complex Systems of Systems

“…The competency elements are further described across SE proficiency levels from Technical Engineer (Level I) to Program Systems Engineer (Level IV). Squires, Larson, and Sauser [15] analyze competencies for space systems, bringing in additional detail relating to requirements such as needs statements and operational environment. It also includes systems assurance as a separate topic.…”

Using a TRIZ framework for systems engineering trade studies

“…Trade studies are also useful to make informed choices among alternative designs in order to select the most cost‐effective solution that meets customer needs, and can contrast/compare technical solutions for systems [Squires, Larson, and Sauser, 2010]. This paper will illustrate that TRIZ (the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is also useful for trade studies, especially as related to performance optimization.…”