2018
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.n0127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping seafloor massive sulfides with the Golden Eye frequency-domain EM profiler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By submerging the GOLDEN EYE in a seawater pool with various configurations, it was experimentally proven that the distortions were related to the pressure housings in close proximity of the TX and RX coils. Thus, substantial post-processing and calibration was required to successfully analyse and invert the data sets (Müller et al, 2018). Due to the nature of a compact multi-sensor platform, positioning of pressure housings out of the sensor's range is not possible.…”
Section: F R E Qu E N C Y -D O M a I N S Y S T E Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By submerging the GOLDEN EYE in a seawater pool with various configurations, it was experimentally proven that the distortions were related to the pressure housings in close proximity of the TX and RX coils. Thus, substantial post-processing and calibration was required to successfully analyse and invert the data sets (Müller et al, 2018). Due to the nature of a compact multi-sensor platform, positioning of pressure housings out of the sensor's range is not possible.…”
Section: F R E Qu E N C Y -D O M a I N S Y S T E Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GE-OMAR's MARTEMIS time-domain electromagnetic (TDEM) and the GOLDEN EYE frequency-domain electromagnetic (FDEM) loop system, operated by Germany's Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), have been developed and deployed at various hydrothermal fields. Conductive structures at the TAG and Palinuro Seamount (Hölz et al, 2015) and in the German licence areas were successfully mapped for polymetallic sulphides at the Central Indian Ridge (Schwalenberg et al, 2016;Müller et al, 2018). Sensor operations in mid-ocean ridge settings, at seamounts of complex bathymetry, and under harsh weather conditions, require rigid and compact devices for safe on-board handling and deepwater surveying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, galvanometric and electromagnetic methods have been used for the exploration and assessment of SMS resources. These methods include the controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) method, the direct current (DC) resistivity imaging method, the transient electromagnetic (TEM) method, and the passive self‐potential (SP) method (see case studies in Cairns et al., 1996; Constable et al., 2018; Galley et al., 2021; Gehrmann et al., 2019; Haroon et al., 2018; Ishizu et al., 2019; Kawada & Kasaya, 2018; Müller et al., 2018; Su, Tao, Shen et al., 2022; Szitkar et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2020). However, ore bodies and metallic deposits are not always characterized by conductivity contrasts (Mao & Revil, 2016; Mao et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, galvanometric and induction‐based electromagnetic methods are broadly used in seafloor massive sulfide explorations (e.g., Ishizu et al, 2019; Müller et al, 2018, and references therein). Active source methods include induced polarization (IP), electrical conductivity tomography, the time domain electromagnetic method (TEM), and controlled source frequency domain electromagnetic method (CSEM) (Gehrmann et al, 2019; Haroon et al, 2018; Ishizu et al, 2019; Müller et al, 2018; Schwalenberg et al, 2016). Among these methods, TEM and CSEM have been quite popular since continuous measurements can be performed while the sensors are towed by a vessel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%