2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping riparian condition indicators in a sub-tropical savanna environment from discrete return LiDAR data using object-based image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also show the potential of LiDAR data to describe riparian vegetation; but most of these are focused on forest applications (Farid et al, 2006(Farid et al, , 2008Greenberg et al, 2012;Wasser et al, 2013). Only a few studies can be found on the potential of LiDAR data to describe the ecological attributes of riparian zone (Hall et al, 2009;Johansen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies also show the potential of LiDAR data to describe riparian vegetation; but most of these are focused on forest applications (Farid et al, 2006(Farid et al, , 2008Greenberg et al, 2012;Wasser et al, 2013). Only a few studies can be found on the potential of LiDAR data to describe the ecological attributes of riparian zone (Hall et al, 2009;Johansen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small gaps that did not reach the 3 thresholds conditions were merged with riparian forest patches, considering they do not represent a meaningful gap in riparian forest continuity. This approach was adapted from Johansen et al (2010), who used a plant projective cover layer instead of the CHM layer to map riparian forest patches in the context of a dry sub-tropical savannah.…”
Section: Disaggregation and Re-aggregation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NDSM height: In typical vegetation mapping studies, the most important LIDAR-derived parameter is the vegetation canopy height [57,94,95]. This is represented by the Normalized Differential Surface Model (NDSM), which is generated by creating both a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) from the LIDAR points reflected from the actual terrain surface, and a Digital Surface Model (DSM) from the points corresponding to the top of the canopy, and then subtracting the DTM height from the DSM height.…”
Section: Airborne Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the typical linear and narrow shape of the riparian zones, fieldbased monitoring involves sampling, high labor costs, and time-consuming travels (Debruxelles et al 2009;Myers 1989). The continuous improvement of the spatial resolution of remote sensing data combined with more powerful computer capacity and new geomatic procedures to extract information make the remote sensing approach more competitive (Alber and Piégay 2011;Carbonneau and Piégay 2012;Johansen et al 2010;Michez et al 2013;Roux et al 2014). The use of this very-high-resolution (VHR) imagery in a multitemporal approach is an emerging topic (Ardila et al 2012;Champion 2012;Lasaponara et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%