“…Drawing on a sociocultural perspective, Burnard and Haddon (2016) proposed the existence of “diverse musical creativities” in relation to the individual (i.e., personal characteristics), the field (social systems in music and music education), and the domain (cultural systems in relation to music), where several musical creativity practices coexist, such as “individual,” “communal,” “collective,” “collaborative,” “performance,” “symbolic,” “empathic,” “interdisciplinary,” “computational,” “intercultural,” and “digital” practices. Also in regard to the study of musical creativity, a recent bibliometric review (Ozenc-Ira, 2023) unveiled eight primary topical foci: “computational creativity, processes of improvisation, improvisation teaching and learning, interactions/collaboration during improvisation, effects of improvisation practice, innovative music technology, [and] aesthetic aspects of everyday creativity and music therapy” (p. 1). As this classification demonstrates, studies on beliefs about creativity regarding music, albeit present, do not constitute a central topic in the field.…”