1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00443.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Recharge Areas Using a Ground‐Water Flow Model – A Case Study

Abstract: We have developed a method to calculate ground‐ water recharge rates using the mass‐balance equation, water‐ table elevation data, estimates of hydraulic conductivity, and aquifer thickness data, and have applied this method to produce a map of the recharge and discharge patterns for a ground‐water basin in central Wisconsin. This recharge mapping method is simplified using a modified computer program, the USGS Modular Groundwater Flow Model (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1984). The modeled recharge pattern compares … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverse groundwater flow modelling is a variation on the water-balance method used specifically for estimating recharge (Stoertz and Bradbury, 1989). Inverse modelling has the advantages of requiring no information about the unsaturated zone and no assumptions regarding the mechanism of water movement through it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse groundwater flow modelling is a variation on the water-balance method used specifically for estimating recharge (Stoertz and Bradbury, 1989). Inverse modelling has the advantages of requiring no information about the unsaturated zone and no assumptions regarding the mechanism of water movement through it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use ofthe finite difference model was recommended in this study, which can be run with relatively few idealizing assumptions and can easily be calibrated to produce more accurate return flow values than the other me1hods. Stoertz and Bradbury (1989) used MODFLOW to map regional recharge areas.…”
Section: Finite Difference Groundwater Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use ofthe finite difference model was recommended in this study, which can be run with relatively few idealizing assumptions and can easily be calibrated to produce more accurate return flow values than the other me1hods. Stoertz and Bradbury (1989) used MODFLOW to map regional recharge areas.The data requirements for the USGS Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model MODFLOW are shown in Table 4.1, along with indications as to which input data types can be prepared wi1h the aid ofgeographic infonnation systems (GIS). Application of GIS to preparation ofinput data files for MODFLOW is detailed in the following chapter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive research on recharge estimation at a variety of scales [2][3][4], including studies that assess spatial and temporal recharge variability [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Nevertheless, groundwater modelers, planners, and policy makers frequently use a single recharge value for an entire watershed calculated as an assumed fraction of the annual average precipitation or as determined by model calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%