2012
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20121192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping plant species ranges in the Hawaiian Islands: developing a methodology and associated GIS layers

Abstract: This report documents a methodology for projecting the geographic ranges of plant species in the Hawaiian Islands. The methodology consists primarily of the creation of several geographic information system (GIS) data layers depicting attributes related to the geographic ranges of plant species. The most important spatial-data layer generated here is an objectively defined classification of climate as it pertains to the distribution of plant species. By examining previous zonal-vegetation classifications in li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For projecting GF results, we first used the GF predict function to predict genetic variation across all grid cells on the island of Hawaii. We then mapped the resulting predictions across the landscape masked by the expected distribution of A. koa / A. koaia (J.P. Price et al., ) using principal components of the predictions to generate a red–green–blue color scale according to the first three axes. Genetic offset under the future climate scenario was then estimated by first using the GF predict function with the future climate data and then estimating Euclidean distance between current predictions and future predictions weighted by variable importance for each grid cell on the landscape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For projecting GF results, we first used the GF predict function to predict genetic variation across all grid cells on the island of Hawaii. We then mapped the resulting predictions across the landscape masked by the expected distribution of A. koa / A. koaia (J.P. Price et al., ) using principal components of the predictions to generate a red–green–blue color scale according to the first three axes. Genetic offset under the future climate scenario was then estimated by first using the GF predict function with the future climate data and then estimating Euclidean distance between current predictions and future predictions weighted by variable importance for each grid cell on the landscape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116 Priority I areas are within the "Very wet," and Moderately wet" zones. Priority II areas include "Moist mesic" and "Seasonally mesic" zones.…”
Section: Appendix II -Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those two colonies are located above the cloud layer in the same dry subalpine moisture zone, where evapotranspiration is high even inside burrows (Whittow et al 1984;simons 1985;ainley et al 1997;hu et al 2001;Price et al 2007). In contrast, petrel breeding colonies on Kauai are primarily in the wettest zones of the archipelago, within the montane cloud belt where evapotranspiration is low (ainley et al 1997;simons and hodges 1998;Price et al 2007). Despite the large differences in expected evaporative water loss between Maui and Kauai hatch-year petrels, their mean δD values are very similar (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%