2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping oxygen stable isotopes of precipitation in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
115
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
115
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this view, to emphasize the variation of Po river water in 2017, LC-exc was calculated with respect to the updated Northern Italy meteoric water line reported by Giustini et al [36]:…”
Section: Derived Parameters: Calculation Of D-excess and Lc-excessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this view, to emphasize the variation of Po river water in 2017, LC-exc was calculated with respect to the updated Northern Italy meteoric water line reported by Giustini et al [36]:…”
Section: Derived Parameters: Calculation Of D-excess and Lc-excessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41]. The Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) defined for Northern Italy [36] is also reported in grey for comparison.…”
Section: Isotopic Variation At the Pontelagoscuro Closing Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between δ 2 H and δ 18 O in precipitation delineates meteoric water lines (MWL), as firstly proposed by [56], who defined the global meteoric water line (GMWL) as a line calculated with ordinary least square regression method that has the formula δ 2 H = 8 × δ 18 O + 10. There are also many regional or local meteoric water lines (LMWLs) that differ from the GMWL in both slope and deuterium intercept, as a result of varying climatic and geographic parameters [57]. The degree by which the LMWL departs from the GMWL can reveal important information about the meteoric sources of water (e.g., oceanic or terrestrial) and atmospheric conditions during transport [57][58][59].…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.2.2). Slopes higher than the GMWL slope (8) are not uncommon in Italy, which presents a high slope variability among different sampling sites, ranging from 4.9 to 9.2 (Longinelli and Selmo, 2003;Giustini et al, 2016). The higher slope at RG3 indicates that little if any evaporation is occurring in the water source system: an occurrence consistent with coarse debris setting and very limited vegetation cover producing high infiltration rates in the rock-glacier system (Williams et al, 2006).…”
Section: Export Of Solutes During Rain Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%