Mapping of verbal working memory in nonfluent Chinese–English bilinguals with functional MRI

Abstract

Existing cognitive and neural imaging studies have suggested a frontoparietal network of multiple, cooperative components for verbal working memory (WM). We used functional MRI to investigate whether this neural network is also involved in the processing of second language by nonfluent bilinguals. Twelve (five males, seven females) native Chinese speakers who had limited English proficiency were scanned while performing working memory tasks in Chinese and English. They were asked to make judgment continuously whether the word presented on the screen was semantically related to (i.e., the semantic tasks) another word presented two words earlier. On a different task (i.e., the phonological tasks), they were asked to make judgment whether the target word rhymed with the other word. A naming and judgment task in each language was adopted to control for the visual process, initial lexical process, and motor responses. Behavioral data showed that subjects performed better at tasks in their native language (Chinese, L1) than in English (L2). Imaging results showed that all working memory tasks in both L1 and L2 elicited a very similar pattern of left-hemisphere-dominated activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, pars opercularis region, pars triangularis region, precentral cortex, and parietal lobule. Consistent with the behavioral data, the volume of activation in the left opercularis region, left parietal lobule, and right precentral region was greater for L2 than for L1. These results suggest that working memory in L1 and L2 is mediated by a unitary neural system (i.e., frontoparietal region), which is capable of recruiting surrounding cortical resources to meet the increased computational demand caused by low L2 proficiency.

Cerebral Asymmetry in the Fusiform Areas Predicted the Efficiency of Learning a New Writing System

“…Moreover, we found that individual differences in AI were more pronounced when processing a novel writing (i.e., Korean Hangul), which seemed to corroborate the Dehaene et al (1997) finding of greater individual differences in second-language processing. One explanation of these results is that individual differences in neural responses might be amplified with increasing cognitive demand placed by a new or newly learned language (Xue, Dong, Zhen, & Chen, 2004;Hasegawa, Carpenter, & Just, 2002;Chee, Hon, Lee, & Soon, 2001). In response to this increased cognitive demand, it is possible that different individuals may use different types of neural compensation.…”

A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?

“…Most studies on bilingual word-level comprehension have used written stimuli and asked their subjects to perform some kind of semantic decision, either in the form of a semantic matchto-sample task (Chee, Hon, Lee, & Soon, 2001;Pillai et al, 2004) or in the form of a semantic judgment task (Ding et al, 2003;Illes et al, 1999;Xue, Dong, Jin, & Chen, 2004). Except for Illes et al, all studies used nonlinguistic stimuli in the control conditions, so that the observed activations might reflect all processing components involved in reading as well as semantic decision.…”

Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities

“…Working memory was tested with the typical 2-back paradigm (Owen, McMillan, Laird, & Bullmore, 2005;Xue, Dong, Jin, & Chen, 2004). Participants were presented with three series of characters (two series of Chinese characters and one series of Tibetan letters) sequentially and were asked to continuously judge whether the current character was related to the character presented two characters earlier (hence the name ''2-back'').…”