2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05854-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of lumbar multifidus stiffness Quantification in ankylosing spondylitis with shear-wave elastography

Abstract: Background Lower back pain and stiffness are the typical symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this study, muscle mass was assessed by muscle density, mechanical elasticity, and area. We investigated the characteristics of lumbar paraspinal-muscle (PSM) mass using muscle ultrasound shear-wave elastography (SWE), as well as the validity of this method for identifying patients with AS. Methods We recruited a representative cohort of 30 AS patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the values were reported in the wrong unit or the decimal point was incorrect. References: [1] (Alfuraih et al, 2020), [2] (Aljinović et al, 2020), [3] (Botanlioglu et al, 2013), [4] (Botanlıoğlu et al, 2019), [5] (Dieterich et al, 2020), [6] (Ertekin et al, 2021), [7] (Gao et al, 2020), [8] (Gökşen et al, 2021), [9] (Hashimoto et al, 2022), [10] (Hvedstrup et al, 2020), [11] (Klauser et al, 2022), [12] (Kolding et al, 2018), [13] (Koppenhaver et al, 2020), [14] (Leong et al, 2016), [15] (Li et al, 2021), [16] (Lin et al, 2022), [17] (Masaki et al, 2017), [18] (Masaki et al, 2019), [19] (Murillo et al, 2019), [20] (Pinto et al, 2022), [21] (Sedlackova et al, 2021), [22] (Takashima et al, 2017), [23] (Taş et al, 2018), [24] (Valera‐Calero et al, 2021), [25] (Wang, Cui, et al, 2022), [26] (Wang, Liu, et al, 2022) and [27] (Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps the values were reported in the wrong unit or the decimal point was incorrect. References: [1] (Alfuraih et al, 2020), [2] (Aljinović et al, 2020), [3] (Botanlioglu et al, 2013), [4] (Botanlıoğlu et al, 2019), [5] (Dieterich et al, 2020), [6] (Ertekin et al, 2021), [7] (Gao et al, 2020), [8] (Gökşen et al, 2021), [9] (Hashimoto et al, 2022), [10] (Hvedstrup et al, 2020), [11] (Klauser et al, 2022), [12] (Kolding et al, 2018), [13] (Koppenhaver et al, 2020), [14] (Leong et al, 2016), [15] (Li et al, 2021), [16] (Lin et al, 2022), [17] (Masaki et al, 2017), [18] (Masaki et al, 2019), [19] (Murillo et al, 2019), [20] (Pinto et al, 2022), [21] (Sedlackova et al, 2021), [22] (Takashima et al, 2017), [23] (Taş et al, 2018), [24] (Valera‐Calero et al, 2021), [25] (Wang, Cui, et al, 2022), [26] (Wang, Liu, et al, 2022) and [27] (Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In six further reports (20.0%), the settings can be obtained from the published images (Botanlıoğlu et al, 2019; Itoigawa et al, 2022; Li et al, 2021; Lin et al, 2022; Sedlackova et al, 2021; Takashima et al, 2017). Solely five articles (16.6%) reported precisely how sufficient image quality was monitored and ascertained (Dieterich et al, 2020; Gao et al, 2020; Koppenhaver et al, 2020; Li et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2022) and six articles (20.0%) provided imprecise information on quality assurance (Friede et al, 2020; Hashimoto et al, 2022; Klauser et al, 2022; Murillo et al, 2019; Valera‐Calero et al, 2021; Wang, Liu, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations