2016
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2016.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of long-range chromatin interactions by proximity ligation-assisted ChIP-seq

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
246
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
246
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Very recently, PLAC-seq and HiChIP were introduced as another many-to-all approach that enables identification of long-range interactions associated with specific proteins of interest (Fang et al 2016, Mumbach et al 2016). In these methods, first DNA fragmentation and in situ proximity ligation are performed in the cross-linked cells just as in in situ Hi-C, and then chromatin immunoprecipitation using specific antibodies is carried out, followed by enrichment of biotinylated ligation junctions.…”
Section: Tools To Explore 3d Genome Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently, PLAC-seq and HiChIP were introduced as another many-to-all approach that enables identification of long-range interactions associated with specific proteins of interest (Fang et al 2016, Mumbach et al 2016). In these methods, first DNA fragmentation and in situ proximity ligation are performed in the cross-linked cells just as in in situ Hi-C, and then chromatin immunoprecipitation using specific antibodies is carried out, followed by enrichment of biotinylated ligation junctions.…”
Section: Tools To Explore 3d Genome Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contacts within the same compartment are enriched, whereas contacts between different compartments are depleted. The Hi-C data are from mouse embryonic stem cells (Fang et al 2016) and are visualized with Juicebox (Durand et al 2016). ( b ) Principal-component analysis (PCA) on the observed/expected matrix partitions each chromosome into two compartments, A and B, based on the first principal component (PC1).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, to improve the resolution and sensitivity of Hi-C assays, in situ protocols have been developed. In addition, for focussed interaction mapping oligonucleotide capture technology has been used to enrich for regions of interest (such as promoters) in the Hi-C library prior to high-throughput sequencing [119][120][121] or chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with Hi-C to interrogate individual protein-centric conformation maps 122 The use of oligo-capture technology significantly improves sensitivity and resolution without the associated increase in sequencing costs required for high-resolution analysis of traditional Hi-C libraries. 113 Importantly, Chromosome conformation capture-based assays have been used to successfully identify targets of disease-associated variation in other cell types 111,112,120,123 including human CD4 and CD8 populations, 124 and data from a genome-wide H3K27ac Hi CHIP (acetylated histone CHIP and conformation capture) performed in na€ ıve T cells, Th17 and Treg, have annotated accessible chromatin interacting with regulatory elements, 125 shedding new light on the lineage-specific interactome in these cells.…”
Section: Mapping the 3d Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the repeated independent findings of association of PCSK2 variations with parameters involved in diabetes risk in a variety of different populations clearly implies functionality, whether these represent direct or indirect effects is not yet clear. Further work mapping possible chromatin interactions of intronic variants [32] represents an interesting avenue for further research which could lead to possible indirect gene targets. In this work we have attempted to approach this problem by examining coding variants for this enzyme, one of which, although rare in the general population, was found to be enriched in the Old Order Amish, suggesting a founder effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%