2003
DOI: 10.1071/ar03026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of genomic regions associated with net form of netblotch resistance in barley

Abstract: Abstract. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with resistance to net blotch and their chromosomal locations were determined from analyses of doubled haploid progeny of Alexis/Sloop, Arapiles/Franklin, Sloop/Halcyon, and recombinant inbred lines of Sloop-sib/Alexis. Five QTLs on chromosomes 2H, 3H, and 4H were found to be associated with seedling resistance to the net form of net blotch. In Arapiles/Franklin and Alexis/Sloop populations, 4 significant QTLs explaining 9-17% of the variation in net blotch r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the RFLP markers MWG733 and ABC261 as reference points between the DArT consensus map (Wenzl et al, 2006) and the linkage group defi ning the Un8 location (Eckstein et al, 2002), the Un8 gene maps to the 127-133 cM interval on chromosome 1H on the DArT consensus map. This locus has also been identifi ed by Steffenson et al (1996) and Raman et al (2003). Grewal et al (2008) identifi ed several QTL infl uencing resistance to net-form net blotch isolate WR858, including a major QTL explaining 65% of the variability on chromosome 6H at interval 75-78 cM on the DArT consensus map.…”
Section: Association Mappingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Using the RFLP markers MWG733 and ABC261 as reference points between the DArT consensus map (Wenzl et al, 2006) and the linkage group defi ning the Un8 location (Eckstein et al, 2002), the Un8 gene maps to the 127-133 cM interval on chromosome 1H on the DArT consensus map. This locus has also been identifi ed by Steffenson et al (1996) and Raman et al (2003). Grewal et al (2008) identifi ed several QTL infl uencing resistance to net-form net blotch isolate WR858, including a major QTL explaining 65% of the variability on chromosome 6H at interval 75-78 cM on the DArT consensus map.…”
Section: Association Mappingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…2006). Raman et al. (2003) also identified a QTL on 3HL in ‘Alexis’ and ‘Arapiles’ as minor genes ( R 2 values ranged 13–16% for the closest AFLP marker P14/M61‐154), where their locations are in the similar position of 3H in ‘Pompadour’ based on one of the common linked SSR marker Bmag0225.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, QTL on 2H, 3H, 4H and 6H were also identified in the Australian cultivars at seeding and adult stages against different isolates which included NB50, NB81 and NB52B used in this study (Cakir et al. 2003, Raman et al. 2003, Emebiri et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several studies using various RIL and doubled haploid (DH) mapping populations have identified a region on chromosome 3H which, on the basis of common markers, appears to be in the same region as the major 3H QTLs reported here (Graner et al ., ; Gupta et al ., , ; Raman et al ., ; Yun et al ., ). At least three of these studies also used the Australian isolate NB50 (Gupta et al ., , ; Raman et al ., ). Using this same NB50 isolate on the HN population, we also detected a major QTL on 3H ( R 2 = 0.66) in addition to two minor effect QTLs on 3HL and 5HS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…() used NB50 to evaluate four DH populations, all using the same susceptible parent, and a 3H QTL alone was identified in two of the populations, but the major QTL mapped to either chromosome 6H or 4H in the other two populations. In the DH population of Sloop/Halcyon, seedling resistance to NB50 mapped to chromosomes 4H and 3H with R 2 = 0.64 and 0.09, respectively (Raman et al ., ). Similarly, the Californian isolate 6A has been shown previously to have virulence towards a dominant susceptibility gene on chromosome 6H in the DH population of Rika × Kombar (Abu Qamar et al ., ; Liu et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%