Mapping of coastal aquifer vulnerable zone in the south west coast of Kanyakumari, South India, using GIS-based DRASTIC model

Abstract

The south west coast of Kanyakumari district in Tamil Nadu, India, is significantly affected by seawater intrusion and diffusion of pollutants into the aquifers due to unregulated beach placer mining and other anthropogenic activities. The present study investigates the vulnerability of the coastal aquifers using Geographic Information System (GIS)-based DRASTIC model. The seven DRASTIC parameters have been analyzed using the statistical equation of this model to demarcate the vulnerable zones for aquifer contamination. The vulnerability index map is prepared from the weighted spatial parameters, and an accounting of total index value ranged from 85 to 213. Based on the categorization of vulnerability classes, the high vulnerable zones are found near the beach placer mining areas between Manavalakurichi and Kodimanal coastal stretches. The aquifers associated with settlements and agricultural lands in the middle-eastern part have experienced high vulnerability due to contaminated water bodies. Similarly, the coastal areas of Thengapattinam and Manakudi estuary and around the South Tamaraikulam have also been falling under high vulnerability condition due to backwater and saltpan. In general, the nearshore region except the placer mining zone and the backwater has a moderately vulnerable condition, and the vulnerability index values range from 149 to180. Significantly, the northern and northeastern uplands and some parts of deposition zones in the middle-south coast have been identified as low to no vulnerable conditions. They are structurally controlled by various geological features such as charnockite, garnet biotite gneiss and granites, and sand dunes, respectively. The aquifer vulnerability assessment has been cross-verified by geochemical indicators such as total dissolved solids (TDS), Cl(-), HCO₃(-), and Cl(-)/HCO₃(-) ratio. The high ranges of TDS (1,842--3,736 mg/l) and Cl(-) (1,412--2,112 mg/l) values are well correlated with the observed high vulnerable zones in the study area. The Cl(-)/HCO₃(-) ratio (7.13 to 12.18) of the high vulnerable zone obviously indicates deterioration of the aquifer contamination. Sensitivity analysis has also been performed to evaluate sensitivity of the individual DRASTIC parameters to aquifer vulnerability. This reveals the net recharge rate and groundwater table depth are becoming more sensitive to aquifer contamination. It is realized that the GIS is an effective platform for aquifer vulnerability mapping with reliable accuracy, and hence, the study is more useful for sustainable water resource management and the aquifer conservation.

A Flood Risk Assessment Model for Companies and Criteria for Governmental Decision-Making to Minimize Hazards

“…Thus, Norm I Hazard and Norm I Vulnerability range between 0 and 1. The levels can be classified in equal intervals of 0.2 based on the characteristics of the data because the values are already standardized (see "range of raw data" in the second column of Table 2) [47][48][49][50]. Hazard and vulnerability are categorized into five levels based on the criteria in Table 2.…”

GIS-based assessment of aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC Model: A case study on Kodaganar basin

“…It transports the contaminant to the water table vertically. The total recharge for the study area was estimated by adopting Piscopo method (Kaliraj et al 2015) which is considered a better field based method. The relative weight is assigned as 4 for net recharge.…”

Vulnérabilité des eaux souterraines à la pollution dans la ville de Dschang, Ouest-Cameroun

“…L'insuffisance de la méthode réside au niveau de sa subjectivité des cotes attribuées à chaque paramètre et la variation de la classification selon les auteurs (Napolitano et Fabbri, 1996). Malgré la faiblesse de cette méthode, elle a fait ses preuves en Amérique (Aller et al, 1987), en Europe (Kaliraj et al, 2014), en Afrique (Akenji et al, 2015) et vu sa flexibilité adaptable à tous les environnements géologiques, elle a été testé récemment dans la localité de Foumbot (Fonka et al, 2019). Mais dans ce travail, les cotes attribuées demeurent dans une gamme fonction de la nature du milieu et la variation dans la classification tient compte de l'influence des activités anthropiques du milieu vu que le model de Aller et al est intrinsèque.…”