“…The third group of methods relies on enzymatic detection of stable complexes formed between RNA and oligonucleotide probes (Campbell & Cech, 1995;Lieber & Strauss, 1995;Ho et al+, 1996;Birikh et al+, 1997;Matveeva et al+, 1997)+ In particular, the RNase H cleavage assay identifies RNA regions that form heteroduplexes with libraries of 6-to 11-mer random or semi-random oligonucleotides (Ho et al+, 1996;Wrzesinski et al+, 2000)+ The length of the oligonucleotides used in the RNase H method falls in the mid-range between the shorter and longer probes used in the methods discussed above+ Binding of mid-range probes may also perturb RNA secondary structure, although to a lesser extent than the longer probes (Wrzesinski et al+, 2000)+ In contrast to the conditions used for hybridization with arrays of oligonucleotides, the RNase H assay is performed under nearly physiological conditions and requires much shorter incubation times (from a few minutes to 1 h)+ The parameters used for the RT-ROL method are very close to those of the RNase H cleavage assay+ Indeed, the RT-ROL method analyzes the formation of 6-to 8-nt heteroduplexes, requires short hybridization times, and uses reaction conditions similar to that of RNase H assay+ Not surprisingly, therefore, the extendible sites mapped by RT-ROL correlate best with the accessible sites identified by the RNase H assay (Fig+ 5)+ On the other hand, the results of the RT-ROL and arrays of oligonucleotides methods correlated less well, as illustrated by the b-globin RNA example (Fig+ 6)+ The most obvious difference between the two methods is the lengths of oligonucleotide libraries used for hybridization with RNA+ Indeed, in the analysis of b-globin RNA, the optimal lengths of oligonucleotides used in array hybridization (Milner et al+, 1997) are 14-17 nt+ They are approximately twofold longer than the optimal lengths of the sequences used in RT-ROL+ The differences in oligonucleotide lengths and hybridization conditions that distinguish the RT-ROL and hybridization with oligonucleotide arrays methods would likely have a dramatic effect on the stability of the heteroduplexes detected by each method+ Heteroduplex stability can be estimated from the rate constant, k 1 , of the dissociative pathway as described (Reynaldo et al+, 2000)+ Under the hybridization conditions of the oligonucleotide arrays method (30 8C, 1 M NaCl), the lifetime, 1/k 1 , of a typical 14-mer heteroduplex (50% GϩC) is estimated to be .100 h, whereas under the conditions of the RT-ROL method (42 8C, 10 mM MgCl 2 ), the lifetime of an 8-mer duplex is expected to be approximately 10 ms+ This analysis suggests that the two methods rely upon fundamentally different mechanisms of accessible sites detection+ The oligonucleotide arrays method detects the formation of very stable heteroduplexes that require substantial and, likely, kinetically controlled rearrangements of local RNA structure, whereas the RT-ROL method, as well as the RNase H assay, analyzes short-lived, quickly hybridizing duplexes that probably cause only minor perturbations of RNA structure+ A combination of all three methods would be valuable to draw a complete picture of RNA accessibility+…”