1978
DOI: 10.1029/jb083ib12p05947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping ocean tides with satellites: A computer simulation

Abstract: As a preliminary study for the future worldwide direct mapping of the open ocean tide with satellites equipped with precision altimeters we conducted a simulated study using sets of artificially generated altimeter data constructed from a realistic geoid and four pairs of major tides (O1‐Q1, M2‐N2, K1‐P1, and S2‐K2) in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Recovery of the original geoid and eight tidal maps is accomplished by a space‐time, least squares harmonic analysis scheme. The resultant maps appear fairly sati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first source is, of course, the random measurement error of the instrument. However, as is shown by Zetler and Maul [1971], Won et al [1978], Maul and Yanaway [1978], and the present paper, this error can be overcome as long as it is random.…”
Section: S = • [F(xj Tj) -H(x• T•)] 2 (4)mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first source is, of course, the random measurement error of the instrument. However, as is shown by Zetler and Maul [1971], Won et al [1978], Maul and Yanaway [1978], and the present paper, this error can be overcome as long as it is random.…”
Section: S = • [F(xj Tj) -H(x• T•)] 2 (4)mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Since the altimeter data are obtained more or less ran-domly in time and space, this method is not applicable. The following method follows closely that of Won et al [1978], originally developed for a two-dimensional tidal analysis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Linear Satellite Data For Oceanic Geoid and Tidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation