2001
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

74
633
4
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 869 publications
(722 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
74
633
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45) and middle frontal gyrus (BA 9/46), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (BA 10/11), and anterior cingulate (BA 32) showed error-rate-related activation changes. These areas have been implicated in spatial attentional processes (Mesulam, 1999), conflict and error monitoring (Carter et al, 2000;Botvinick et al, 1999), inhibitory processes (Menon et al, 2001;Liddle et al, 2001;Rubia et al, 2001b), and control of eye movements (Luna et al, 1998). Thus, both groups allocate similar error-rate-related processing resources during this decision-making task.…”
Section: Decision-making and Errors In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45) and middle frontal gyrus (BA 9/46), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (BA 10/11), and anterior cingulate (BA 32) showed error-rate-related activation changes. These areas have been implicated in spatial attentional processes (Mesulam, 1999), conflict and error monitoring (Carter et al, 2000;Botvinick et al, 1999), inhibitory processes (Menon et al, 2001;Liddle et al, 2001;Rubia et al, 2001b), and control of eye movements (Luna et al, 1998). Thus, both groups allocate similar error-rate-related processing resources during this decision-making task.…”
Section: Decision-making and Errors In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, attentional processes that involve sustained, and possibly selective, attention (Coull et al, 1996), switching from task-relevant local to global targets (Fink et al, 1996;Lamb et al, 1989), voluntary attentional control (Hopfinger et al, 2000), and the distinction between taskirrelevant and task-relevant events (Downar et al, 2001;Kiehl et al, 2001;McCarthy et al, 1997) support the view that this area is critical for the extraction and selection of task-relevant information. Moreover, this area has been implicated in inhibitory control in a number of different paradigms (Garavan et al, 1999;Menon et al, 2001;Rubia et al, 2001b;Steel et al, 2001;Doricchi et al, 1997), that is, the allocation of resources to a response that has to compete with a highly overlearned and potentially habitual behavior. Several studies using decision-making paradigms have implicated the right posterior parietal cortex in autonomic arousal processes (Tranel and Damasio, 1994;Critchley et al, 2000), risk-taking decision-making (Ernst et al, 2002), and guessing (Elliott et al, 1999).…”
Section: Decision-making and Errors In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The go/no-go task measures response inhibition, and is associated with activation of medial prefrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and parietal areas [111]. Response activation is diminished in PTSD and other anxiety disorders, and increased activation predicts response to treatment [112].…”
Section: Evidence From Neuroimaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy control subjects, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of response inhibition consistently demonstrate the underlying neurobiology to involve activation of the frontalstriatal circuit (Rubia et al, 2001;Aron et al, 2004;Simmonds et al, 2008). The prefrontal cortex (PFC), which includes the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), orbital frontal cortex (OFC) and the inferior frontal cortex (IFC), plays a central role in executive functioning through its influence on subcortical and posterior cortical regions via extensive anatomical connections to these areas (Croxson et al, 2005;Leh et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%