2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 3D visualization, least-cost paths (LCPs), and viewshed analysis are employed to examine how the landscape of Dinas Powys was reflected in the exercise of elite power. The analyses undertaken are comparatively simple 'off the shelf' forms of cartesian analysis that have long been applied in landscape archaeology (Conolly & Lake, 2006), but we have adopted an integrated approach that moves beyond 'typecast' analysis focused on identifying intervisibility between sites (Lock et al, 2014;Gillings, 2017). There is a wide literature on the application of GIS in landscape archaeology (for a recent overview see Howey & Brouwer Burg, 2017), and critiques of the tools employed in this study focus on the reductive nature of movement modelling and the primacy given to visual perception over other forms of sensory engagement (Frieman & Gillings, 2007;Supernant, 2017).…”
Section: Gis and Landscape Analysis: Methods And Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 3D visualization, least-cost paths (LCPs), and viewshed analysis are employed to examine how the landscape of Dinas Powys was reflected in the exercise of elite power. The analyses undertaken are comparatively simple 'off the shelf' forms of cartesian analysis that have long been applied in landscape archaeology (Conolly & Lake, 2006), but we have adopted an integrated approach that moves beyond 'typecast' analysis focused on identifying intervisibility between sites (Lock et al, 2014;Gillings, 2017). There is a wide literature on the application of GIS in landscape archaeology (for a recent overview see Howey & Brouwer Burg, 2017), and critiques of the tools employed in this study focus on the reductive nature of movement modelling and the primacy given to visual perception over other forms of sensory engagement (Frieman & Gillings, 2007;Supernant, 2017).…”
Section: Gis and Landscape Analysis: Methods And Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, interested parties should be cautious in assuming that visibility analyses—and particularly those described here—will always produce meaningful results. Gillings says it best: “Whilst generating them has always been a relatively trivial task, knowing what to do with them once generated has proven far more difficult” (2017:121). Indeed, visibility-based analyses are only as powerful as the questions they answer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como ha sido señalado ya en numerosos trabajos (Fábrega, 2016;Lock y Pouncett, 2017: 130;Gillings, 2017, entre otros) estas herramientas pecan de seguir premisas claramente deterministas y economicistas no teniendo en cuenta los condicionantes culturales que pudieron afectar a las interpretaciones hechas por los SIG. A esto se suma un uso desde una óptica similar por parte de los investigadores hecho por el cual, en los últimos años, y bajo una perspectiva postmodernista eras herramientas han sido cuestionadas (Fábrega, 2016: 161).…”
Section: El Intercambio Y Los Sig: Unas Notasunclassified