2021
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping intracellular pH in tumors using amide and guanidyl CEST‐MRI at 9.4 T

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(236 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high GuanCEST signal at 3 T is consistent with the high field MRI observation, in which the GuanCEST intensity is even higher than the amideCEST intensities with specific B 1 values (GuanCEST 2.9% at 2 μT vs. amideCEST 1.87% at 1 μT). 6,24,25,31,32,61 The GuanCEST has not been well studied on 3 T MRI for 2 reasons, first, most of the previous CEST studies were performed with very few offsets and cannot easily separate the severely overlapped Guan and amideCEST peaks. Second, high saturation power (around 2 μT) was implemented in most APT-weighted studies, 9 which can dramatically decrease the signal at 2.28 ppm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high GuanCEST signal at 3 T is consistent with the high field MRI observation, in which the GuanCEST intensity is even higher than the amideCEST intensities with specific B 1 values (GuanCEST 2.9% at 2 μT vs. amideCEST 1.87% at 1 μT). 6,24,25,31,32,61 The GuanCEST has not been well studied on 3 T MRI for 2 reasons, first, most of the previous CEST studies were performed with very few offsets and cannot easily separate the severely overlapped Guan and amideCEST peaks. Second, high saturation power (around 2 μT) was implemented in most APT-weighted studies, 9 which can dramatically decrease the signal at 2.28 ppm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Because the mixed signal always complicates ArgCEST with creatine and phosphocreatine CEST (CrCEST/PCrCEST) at 2 ppm, 16 the CEST peak at this range is named collectively as GuanCEST. Interestingly, GuanCEST is visible at the high field MRI (>7 T) on both animal [6][7][8]11,32 and human brains. 15,23,34 It has not been observed on 3 T MRI to our best knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CrCEST signal change due to the pH reduction (0.2) was simulated as a function of the CrCEST exchange rate for three B 1 values by fixing the MTC background extracted from the Z‐spectra recorded with 2.0 μT/1 s on WT mice. The exchange rate determination by multiple pH and B 1 values has recently been demonstrated on tissue homogenate 36 . The method can be treated as a simplified version of the same principle using two pH and three B 1 values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method can be treated as a simplified version of the same principle using two pH and three B 1 values. In the simulation, the CrCEST exchange rate is given by 36 kgoodbreak=kc10pH$$ k={k}_c{10}^{pH} $$ with a pH reduction of italicpH$$ \Delta pH $$ introduced by CO 2 inhalation, the CrCEST exchange rate knormalco2$$ {k}_{\mathrm{co}2} $$ during CO2 inhalation will be reduced to knormalco2goodbreak=k10italicpH$$ {k}_{\mathrm{co}2}=k{10}^{-\Delta pH} $$ Then, the CrCEST signal will be alternated due to the exchange rate change (from k to knormalco2$$ {k}_{\mathrm{co}2} $$). The identical two‐step BM fitting was also used to simulate the CrCEST signal at 3T using the human brain Z‐spectrum previously recorded 35 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%