Mapping individual differences across brain network structure to function and behavior with connectome embedding

Abstract

The connectome, a comprehensive map of the brain’s anatomical connections, is often summarized as a matrix comprising all dyadic connections among pairs of brain regions. This representation cannot capture higher-order relations within the brain graph. Connectome embedding (CE) addresses this limitation by creating compact vectorized representations of brain nodes capturing their context in the global network topology. Here, nodes “context” is defined as random walks on the brain graph and as such, represents a generative model of diffusive communication around nodes. Applied to group-averaged structural connectivity, CE was previously shown to capture relations between inter-hemispheric homologous brain regions and uncover putative missing edges from the network reconstruction. Here we extend this framework to explore individual differences with a novel embedding alignment approach. We test this approach in two lifespan datasets (NKI: n = 542; Cam-CAN: n = 601) that include diffusion-weighted imaging, resting-state fMRI, demographics and behavioral measures. We demonstrate that modeling functional connectivity with CE substantially improves structural to functional connectivity mapping both at the group and subject level. Furthermore, age-related differences in this structure-function mapping, are preserved and enhanced. Importantly, CE captures individual differences by out-of-sample prediction of age and intelligence. The resulting predictive accuracy was higher compared to using structural connectivity and functional connectivity. We attribute these findings to the capacity of the CE to incorporate aspects of both anatomy (the structural graph) and function (diffusive communication). Our novel approach allows mapping individual differences in the connectome through structure to function and behavior.

Retrospective behavioral sampling (RBS): a method to effectively track the cognitive fluctuations driven by naturalistic stimulation

“…Individual typicality was found to be stable across movies and story stimuli, thereby tapping into stimulus-invariant individual response tendencies. These results highlight the functional power of coding through similarity distances, which have been previously shown to explain perceptual differences as well as brain specializations (Davidesco et al, 2014; O’Connor et al, 2017; Finn et al, 2020; Ramot et al, 2020; Levakov et al, 2021; Malach, 2021).…”

Long-term morphological and functional dynamics of human stem cell-derived neuronal networks on high-density micro-electrode arrays

“…One of the challenging scientific endeavors in neuroscience is to decipher the process of functional development and network organization ( Sporns, 2013 ; Rosenthal et al, 2018 ; van Atteveldt et al, 2021 ). In this regard, studies on human and animal models have extensively explored neuronal networks, providing substantial understanding of their self-assembling and their function in vivo ( Tau and Peterson, 2010 ; Bassett and Gazzaniga, 2011 ; Latifi et al, 2020 ; Huber et al, 2021 ; Levakov et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2021 ).…”

The effect of 18 months lifestyle intervention on brain age assessed with resting-state functional connectivity

“…The preprocessing pipelines used in this work were extensively described in a previous publication 69 . T1w scans were preprocessed through FreeSurfer’s 70 (version 6.0) recon-all processing.…”