2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping groundwater-dependent ecosystems by means of multi-layer supervised classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining area, corresponding essentially to the weathered mantles, was predicted as the medium potential class (class-1) which is consistent with the results outlined in Table 6. Martínez-Santos et al (2021) argue that the results obtained by machine learning methods should be verified beyond standard machine learning indicators whenever possible. In this case, the results of the agreement map were cross-checked with variables such as the number of boreholes, the average yield of the boreholes, the percentage of wells exceeding 10 m 3 /h, and the average success rate of boreholes located in the different yield domains.…”
Section: Borehole Yield Potential Maps and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining area, corresponding essentially to the weathered mantles, was predicted as the medium potential class (class-1) which is consistent with the results outlined in Table 6. Martínez-Santos et al (2021) argue that the results obtained by machine learning methods should be verified beyond standard machine learning indicators whenever possible. In this case, the results of the agreement map were cross-checked with variables such as the number of boreholes, the average yield of the boreholes, the percentage of wells exceeding 10 m 3 /h, and the average success rate of boreholes located in the different yield domains.…”
Section: Borehole Yield Potential Maps and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending upon intended level of detail, global mapping of GDEs can thus be associated with considerable effort in terms of data volume and processing and might be affected by inconsistent data availability and quality across regions and between different data types (Eamus and Froend 2006, Kuginis et al 2016, Pérez Hoyos et al 2016, UNDP 2022. The current state of the art in GDE mapping addressing larger regions of regional to continental scale, refers to studies associated with the US (Howard et al 2010, Brown et al 2011, Mathie et al 2011, Gou et al 2015, South Africa (Colvin et al 2002, Münch andConrad 2007), the Iberian Peninsula (Marques et al 2019, Páscoa et al 2020, Martínez-Santos et al 2021, Central Asia (Liu et al 2021), as well as the Australian continent (Doody et al 2017). These classify GDEs at different resolutions, ranging from watershed level at slightly below 100 km 2 (Howard et al 2010, Brown et al 2011) to 25 m spatial resolution (Münch and Conrad 2007, Doody et al 2017, Marques et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping of GEF can be achieved through ecosystem fieldwork [41], and remote sensing data are necessary and feasible for studying GEF in regions. The identification methods based on remote sensing include supervised classification [42], unsupervised classification [43], index classification [44], and standardized NDVI classification [45,46]. For example, Australia carried out catchment-scale mapping research on groundwater-dependent ecosystems to provide a scientific basis for natural resource management in 2015 [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%