2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2999906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Gender: Shedding Empirical Light on Family Courtss Treatment of Cases Involving Abuse and Alienation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the absence of valid science supporting PAS/PAD/PA has been widely acknowledged, as described above, the concept is better understood as ideology, not scientific theory (Milchman, ; Walker, Brantley, & Rigsbee, ). Since various decision‐making bodies, including trial courts (see DV LEAP, 2019; Meier, 2020) and appeals courts (Milchman, ) are sometimes swayed by such rhetoric, and may themselves share implicit biases and prejudicial assumptions that make some of the rhetoric appear plausible (Haselschwerdt, Hardesty, & Hans, ; Meier & Dickson, ; Milchman, ; Saunders et al, ), it falls to scholars to address the problem. They must acknowledge the complexity of parent rejection, educate the courts about the need for a multicausal assessment and interpretation in individual cases, and express their opposition to “decision by rhetoric.”…”
Section: Distorted Claims Of Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given that the absence of valid science supporting PAS/PAD/PA has been widely acknowledged, as described above, the concept is better understood as ideology, not scientific theory (Milchman, ; Walker, Brantley, & Rigsbee, ). Since various decision‐making bodies, including trial courts (see DV LEAP, 2019; Meier, 2020) and appeals courts (Milchman, ) are sometimes swayed by such rhetoric, and may themselves share implicit biases and prejudicial assumptions that make some of the rhetoric appear plausible (Haselschwerdt, Hardesty, & Hans, ; Meier & Dickson, ; Milchman, ; Saunders et al, ), it falls to scholars to address the problem. They must acknowledge the complexity of parent rejection, educate the courts about the need for a multicausal assessment and interpretation in individual cases, and express their opposition to “decision by rhetoric.”…”
Section: Distorted Claims Of Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has documented courts' tendency to adopt alienation labels even though supporting evidence for alienation is lacking (Milchman, ). Too ready acceptance of alienation as the reason why a child rejects a parent appears particularly likely when alienation is used to counter abuse allegations, with significant negative impact on outcomes for mothers purporting to seek to protect their children (Meier & Dickson, ; Meier et al, ). At minimum, a descriptive language is needed that is rich enough to counter decision‐making by labeling.…”
Section: Alienation Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the court relies on evaluators who are oblivious to domestic violence research, judges do not recognize the ways abusers use coercive control. The consequences for children and society as a whole are devastating (Meier, 2017).…”
Section: Can An Ethics Advisory Help To Civilize Rhode Island Family mentioning
confidence: 99%