Mapping fire history and quantifying burned area through 35 years of prescribed fire history at an Illinois tallgrass prairie restoration site using GIS

Abstract

1. Fire was important to pre-colonization prairies. In today's remnant and reconstructed prairies, managers frequently employ prescribed fire, a historical management practice that limits woody encroachment, suppresses non-native species and promotes nutrient cycling. However, few long-term prescribed fire spatial datasets are available for study.2. We used archived images of prescribed fire maps and hand-drawn fire records to generate a geospatial record of the prescribed fire history at Nachusa Grasslands, a combination remnant and restored preserve in northern Illinois.3. This record contains maps of the prescribed fire history of the preserve across the entirety of its 35-year history. We used the maps to calculate both the absolute area and percentage of the preserve burned every year.4. This dataset compiles a long history of prescribed fire on a nature preserve and, due to the existing robust research programme at the preserve, can support the study of patterns in management applications of prescribed fire and examine the impacts of prescribed fire in restoration projects.

We asked and #GenerationRestoration delivered: The joint special feature between the British Ecological Society and the Society for Ecological Restoration

“…This probably reflects the case‐based nature of restoration projects impeding larger syntheses and a focus of institutions, granting agencies and even journals on novel approaches at the expense of collaboration and replication to enhance proper assessment and using sophisticated frameworks and methods that already exist. Even though authors highlighted the critical role of knowledge and data sharing to ensure syntheses are robust (Ladouceur, McGowan, et al, 2022), proposed frameworks (Galatowitsch, 2023; Ladouceur, Shackelford, et al, 2022) and syntheses (Romanelli et al, 2020), and shared data on large‐scale management decisions (Rowland‐Schaefer et al, 2022), significant gaps in frameworks and outcome assessments remain. We are not the only ones who have identified this issue, of course.…”

We asked and #GenerationRestoration delivered: the Joint Special Feature between the British Ecological Society and the Society for Ecological Restoration

“…This probably reflects the case‐based nature of restoration projects impeding larger syntheses and a focus of institutions, granting agencies, and even journals on novel approaches at the expense of collaboration and replication to enhance proper assessment and using sophisticated frameworks and methods that already exist. Even though authors highlighted the critical role of knowledge and data sharing to ensure syntheses are robust (Ladouceur et al 2022 b ), proposed frameworks (Ladouceur et al 2022 a ; Galatowitsch 2023) and syntheses (Romanelli et al 2020), and shared data on large‐scale management decisions (Rowland‐Schaefer et al 2022), significant gaps in frameworks and outcome assessments remain. We are not the only ones who have identified this issue, of course.…”