2007
DOI: 10.1353/sof.2007.0055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Educational Inequality: Concentrations of Poverty among Poor and Minority Students in Public Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
117
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other researchers find that that school transfers, charter schools, and private schools may be used to avoid contact between relatively privileged students and students of less privileged races and socioeconomic classes, thereby increasing class and racial segregation within school districts (DeSena, 2006;Fairlie, 2002;Renzulli & Evans, 2005;Saporito, 2003;Saporito & Sohoni, 2006). Further, students who take advantage of non-neighborhood public school choice options tend to be more educated (Witte & Thorn, 1996), have higher incomes, and are more likely to have employed parents compared to students within the same school or school district who do not avail themselves of these options (Henig, 1995;Martinez, Godwin, & Kemerer, 1996;Smrekar & Goldring, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other researchers find that that school transfers, charter schools, and private schools may be used to avoid contact between relatively privileged students and students of less privileged races and socioeconomic classes, thereby increasing class and racial segregation within school districts (DeSena, 2006;Fairlie, 2002;Renzulli & Evans, 2005;Saporito, 2003;Saporito & Sohoni, 2006). Further, students who take advantage of non-neighborhood public school choice options tend to be more educated (Witte & Thorn, 1996), have higher incomes, and are more likely to have employed parents compared to students within the same school or school district who do not avail themselves of these options (Henig, 1995;Martinez, Godwin, & Kemerer, 1996;Smrekar & Goldring, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional data available to us were insufficient to determine causeand-effect relationships between social organization factors and substance use. Individual-level self-reported data is generally reliable (Gruenewald & Johnson, 2006), but because our study included only public school students, the sample may lack representative numbers of wealthier children frequently enrolled in private school (Saporito & Sohoni, 2007). Our model included, importantly, a sound measure of alcohol availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos estudios han documentado altos niveles de pobreza en determinadas escuelas, con el argumento de que los estudiantes de los grupos minoritarios están en escuelas de alta pobreza caracterizadas por contar con menos recursos y más bajos niveles de logro del estudiante (Saporito & Sohoni, 2007).…”
Section: Página 15unclassified