Mapping Ecosystem Services: From Biophysical Processes to (Mis)Uses

Dufour, Simon; Sartre, Xavier Arnauld de; Castro, Mónica; Grimaldi, Michel; Clec’h, Solen Le; Oszwald, Johan

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_13

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I also applied a CPG framework to this analysis, which has been little utilized to study PES; exceptions include Lave, Doyle, et al (2018) who examine stream mitigation banking, and Tadaki, Allen, et al (2015) and Dufour et al (2018) who analyze perceptions and mapping of ecosystem services, but not specific PES programs. CPG aims to fully integrate the epistemological approaches of both natural and social science, while at the same time interrogating the power relations and impact of the production of scientific knowledge (Lave et al 2014; Lave 2015; King and Tadaki 2018; Lave, Biermann, et al 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of communal forests in carbon storage: Using and destabilizing carbon measurement in understanding Guatemala's payments for ecosystem services

vonHedemann

2022

Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Communal forests contain more standing carbon than private forests in the Western Highlands of Guatemala.• No statistically significant differences were found in carbon stocks between incentivized and nonincentivized plots. • Measuring carbon can be a tool to describe ecosystems but should not lead to the prioritization of carbon storage or sequestration over other values of forests.Payments for ecosystem services (PES) are a conservation initiative that offer payments to people who own or manage lands that provide desired ecosystem services. Utilizing mixed methods, I examine how PES in the form of government-issued forestry incentives interact with land tenure to affect carbon storage in Guatemala's Western Highlands. Land tenure is a larger determining factor for carbon storage than payments, as communal forests managed by Indigenous Maya K'iche' communities have significantly higher carbon stocks than private landholdings in these same communities. No statistically significant differences were found in carbon stocks between incentivized and non-incentivized plots, and participants enrolled only a fraction of their land, likely prioritizing enrollment of degraded plots. These results indicate the importance of using both social and physical science methods to understand the physical outcomes and social context of forest management. I also reflect on why carbon storage is often prioritized, drawing on a critical physical geography framework to analyze carbon accounting methods. Measuring carbon storage gives us the tools to describe the success of communal forest management, yet I also caution relying on the quantification of ecosystem services as a method for landscape valuation and suggest avoiding prioritizing carbon storage and sequestration.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of communal forests in carbon storage: Using and destabilizing carbon measurement in understanding Guatemala's payments for ecosystem services

vonHedemann

2022

Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mapping Ecosystem Services: From Biophysical Processes to (Mis)Uses

Cited by 1 publication

References 49 publications

The importance of communal forests in carbon storage: Using and destabilizing carbon measurement in understanding Guatemala's payments for ecosystem services

The importance of communal forests in carbon storage: Using and destabilizing carbon measurement in understanding Guatemala's payments for ecosystem services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About