2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping ecosystem services bundles to detect high- and low-value ecosystem services areas for land use management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A key distinguishing feature of the LCA is that the mathematical protocol developed for measuring the elementary flows-materials and energy-is steady-state-based and uses a top-down causality model [35] rather than a constant flow rate (mass per unit time) [41]. Additionally, LCA accounts for flows but not natural infrastructure or ecological funds (EFs) that means that the inflows (LCI) and outflows (products and potential environmental impacts) of LCA do not take into account the EF´s availability (soil, aquatic, and terrestrial ecosystems, atmosphere, and ecological resources) to assess the PS [42]. This means that LCA does not consider reciprocal relationships between the EFs and their flows, i.e., its nexus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key distinguishing feature of the LCA is that the mathematical protocol developed for measuring the elementary flows-materials and energy-is steady-state-based and uses a top-down causality model [35] rather than a constant flow rate (mass per unit time) [41]. Additionally, LCA accounts for flows but not natural infrastructure or ecological funds (EFs) that means that the inflows (LCI) and outflows (products and potential environmental impacts) of LCA do not take into account the EF´s availability (soil, aquatic, and terrestrial ecosystems, atmosphere, and ecological resources) to assess the PS [42]. This means that LCA does not consider reciprocal relationships between the EFs and their flows, i.e., its nexus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five major types of driving forces: socioeconomic, political, technological, natural and cultural driving forces [2].The factors that directly affect the ecosystem process are called direct driving forces, which can be measured and identified at different precisions; by changing the direct driving force, indirect effects are called indirect driving forces, which determine the magnitude of action from its impact on the direct driving force [3]. Exploring the underlying mechanisms can provide an important basis for land management in an environment of greater human impact, it also helps to understand the trade-offs and synergies among multiple environmental factors [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have begun to include the socioeconomic drivers of ESVs into consideration for the implementation of responsive policies. Yang used Pearson's correlations to examine the relationships among ecosystem services and found that ESVs are tightly correlated with socioeconomic status in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Area [20]. Wu found nonlinear relations between GDP and ESV and a similar pattern between population density and ESV by employing analyses of variance (ANOVA), although a more complete causality was not explained [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most existing studies on humandriven mechanisms of socio-economic factors on ESVs focus on the traditional phase and only conduct qualitative descriptions or extract relatively important socioeconomic factors using statistical analysis methods, such as correlation analysis, regression analysis, GeoDetector, PCA, etc. [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%