2018
DOI: 10.1101/261867
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping diversification metrics in macroecological studies: Prospects and challenges

Abstract: The intersection of macroecology and macroevolution is one of the most active research areas today. Macroecological studies are increasingly using phylogenetic diversification metrics to explore the role of evolutionary processes in shaping present-day patterns of biodiversity. Evolutionary explanations of species richness gradients are key for our understanding of how diversity accumulated in a region. For instance, the present-day diversity in a region can be a result of in situ diversification, extinction, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(253 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A complex scenario arises from the multiple processes that determine species distributions across space, including speciation, extinction, and species dispersal as fundamental macroevolutionary processes, mediated at the assemblage level by vicariant events, niche evolution, and ecological filtering and competition, among other factors (Webb et al 2002, Wiens and Donoghue 2004, Fritz and Rahbek 2012. Understanding how these various processes contribute to any individual outcome necessarily involves the integration of both ecological and historical perspectives (Ricklefs 2004, Maestri et al 2018a, Velasco and Pinto-Ledezma 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complex scenario arises from the multiple processes that determine species distributions across space, including speciation, extinction, and species dispersal as fundamental macroevolutionary processes, mediated at the assemblage level by vicariant events, niche evolution, and ecological filtering and competition, among other factors (Webb et al 2002, Wiens and Donoghue 2004, Fritz and Rahbek 2012. Understanding how these various processes contribute to any individual outcome necessarily involves the integration of both ecological and historical perspectives (Ricklefs 2004, Maestri et al 2018a, Velasco and Pinto-Ledezma 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of this metric considers the number of splitting events and the internode distances along the root‐to‐tip path of the phylogeny while giving greater weight to branches closer to the present (Jetz et al., 2012). We estimated this metric using a function implemented by Velasco and Pinto‐Ledezma (2018). Based on the tip speciation rates from the DR metric, we estimated the mean speciation rate for each mountain range based on their corresponding species assemblages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%