2017
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2017.1363526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping current issues in administrative justice: austerity and the ‘more bureaucratic rationality’ approach

Abstract: This article critically reviews recent developments in the administrative justice system; in particular, it considers three key themes: improving initial decisions; administrative review; and the future of tribunals. In each of these areas, some aspects of administrative justice work well, but austerity has presented acute challenges in ensuring the fair and just treatment of people through restrictions upon legal aid; the withdrawal of some appeal rights; and the expansion of administrative review. Consequent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zdrok (2013) subjects the conclusion of C. Szymanski and K. Antolak-Szymanski (2020) to temporal analysis and emphasises that this definition has changed significantly over time, given the procedures that exist not only in parallel with the judiciary and judicial protection but also within the judiciary as an alternative to a full-scale trial. Similar positions are available in foreign scientific and international sources (Thomas and Tomlinson, 2017;Moltmann-Willisch, 2014;European Commission…, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Zdrok (2013) subjects the conclusion of C. Szymanski and K. Antolak-Szymanski (2020) to temporal analysis and emphasises that this definition has changed significantly over time, given the procedures that exist not only in parallel with the judiciary and judicial protection but also within the judiciary as an alternative to a full-scale trial. Similar positions are available in foreign scientific and international sources (Thomas and Tomlinson, 2017;Moltmann-Willisch, 2014;European Commission…, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[13] The demand for rationality in the exercise of governmental power via administrative justice stimulates the values of openness, fairness and accountability in governance in the public sphere. [14] However, the reach of administrative law into the private sphere may be resisted on the argument that such an extension is likely to interfere in the working mechanism of a free market. [15] Indeed, earlier decisions of the courts tend to suggest that the limitation on the exercise of public power by the courts to control arbitrariness does not extend to the private sphere.…”
Section: Nature Of Administrative Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 The sort of tension that exists, particularly in administrative justice, between the imperative to be efficient and work rapidly through multiple cases on the one hand, and the imperative to be considered, deliberative, and just on the other (and to be seen to be so), has been identified as a key outcome of austerity politics. 43 When legal systems are under-resourced, bureaucratic logics of efficiency and targets threaten to overwhelm the ability of judges to be empathetic and listen carefully to cases -even assuming that their desire to do so persists in a bureaucratic environment. 44 It is partly for reasons of resource constraints that in-person court and tribunal hearings are becoming scarcer, with alternative, cheaper forms of dispute resolution acting as substitutes.…”
Section: Law and The Politics Of Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%