2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00058.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems

Abstract: Quantitative assessment of the spatial patterns of all human uses of the oceans and their cumulative effects is needed for implementing ecosystem-based management, marine protected areas, and ocean zoning. Here, we apply methods developed to map cumulative impacts globally to the California Current using more comprehensive and higher-quality data for 25 human activities and 19 marine ecosystems. This analysis indicates where protection and threat mitigation are most needed in the California Current and reveals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
141
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other highly impacted ecosystems identified by Halpern et al (2009) included salt marsh, beach, seagrass, and rocky intertidal.…”
Section: Relative Risk Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other highly impacted ecosystems identified by Halpern et al (2009) included salt marsh, beach, seagrass, and rocky intertidal.…”
Section: Relative Risk Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second paper, Halpern et al (2009) focused on mapping these same cumulative impacts to California Current marine ecosystems with the goal of identifying the most and least impacted areas and the top threats to the region -this analysis included Puget Sound. However, results for Puget Sound proper were not discussed.…”
Section: Relative Risk Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major hurdle is a lack of data. Comprehensive, direct measures of human activities are available in only a few locations, and these are primarily only in developed countries (e.g., Halpern et al, 2009;Micheli et al, 2013;Andersen et al, 2015). Even in regions that might be considered data-rich, appropriate data are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, understanding trophic interactions within persistent seabird hotspots could benefit EBFM and development of harvest rules for forage fisheries. Third, marine spatial management in the CCE requires information on the distribution and connectivity of biological hotspots (Halpern et al 2009, Nur et al 2011, Santora et al 2011b, Adams et al 2012) in order to avoid potential negative interactions (e.g., seabirds and fishing vessels, oil spills; Hyrenbach et al 2000, Hooker and Gerber 2004, Lascelles et al 2012.…”
Section: Significance and Future Calcofi Seabird Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%