Mapping cancer mortality‐to‐incidence ratios to illustrate racial and sex disparities in a high‐risk population

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of incidence and mortality rates are the metrics used most commonly to define cancer‐related racial disparities. In the US, and particularly in South Carolina, these largely disfavor African Americans (AAs). Computed from readily available data sources, the mortality‐to‐incidence rate ratio (MIR) provides a population‐based indicator of survival. METHODS: South Carolina Central Cancer Registry incidence data and Vital Registry death data were used to construct MIRs. ArcGIS 9.2 mapping software was used to map cancer MIRs by sex and race for 8 Health Regions within South Carolina for all cancers combined and for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, oral, and prostate cancers. RESULTS: Racial differences in cancer MIRs were observed for both sexes for all cancers combined and for most individual sites. The largest racial differences were observed for female breast, prostate, and oral cancers, and AAs had MIRs nearly twice those of European Americans (EAs). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing and mapping race‐ and sex‐specific cancer MIRs provides a powerful way to observe the scope of the cancer problem. By using these methods, in the current study, AAs had much higher cancer MIRs compared with EAs for most cancer sites in nearly all regions of South Carolina. Future work must be directed at explaining and addressing the underlying differences in cancer outcomes by region and race. MIR mapping allows for pinpointing areas where future research has the greatest likelihood of identifying the causes of large, persistent, cancer‐related disparities. Other regions with access to high‐quality data may find it useful to compare MIRs and conduct MIR mapping. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Reducing Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Disparities: Performance and Outcomes of a Screening Colonoscopy Program in South Carolina

“…AAs also are diagnosed at younger ages, on average and with later-stage disease, have a higher incidence before the recommended screening age of 50 years, and tend to have worse prognoses even after accounting for other factors [2, 3]. These disparities tend to be much larger in South Carolina (SC) than in the US average [4, 5]. …”

Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Cancer Incidence in Slovakia

“…Racial differences were recorded in all types of cancer. The biggest racial differences were recorded in breast and prostate cancer (Hébert et al, 2009). The social environment may affect different types of cancer in different ways .…”

Working to Eliminate Cancer Health Disparities from Tobacco: A Review of the National Cancer Institute’s Community Networks Program

“…Table 4 shows that 13 CNP networks (#1, 4,6,7,11,12,13,16,18,19,21,23,24) reported that their education and information policy activities, often in conjunction with a broader coalition, resulted in decision-makers either changing policies or affecting a change in the policy agenda. Eight CNPs worked on smoke-free policies (#1, 4,7,11,13,16,18,19), three CNPs worked on allocation of funds for tobacco control programs and research (#6, 19, 23), four CNPs educated policymakers on implementing comprehensive tobacco control (#11, 18,19,21), and one CNP (#24) worked on a city ordinance for storefront advertising.…”