Mapping Behavior Change Wheel Techniques to Digital Behavior Change Interventions: Review

Farhat-ul-Ain,; Popovitš, Olga; Tomberg, Vladimir

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05412-9_20

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Contrary to influencers, who are social media originalists, health promotors are developers of strategies that aim to enable people to improve health. They too, are now increasingly turning to social media to deliver health messages (Ul-Ain et al, 2022). When health promotors aim to design effective health promotion messages, they primarily rely on behavioral change theory and techniques (BCTs) (French et al, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From food media entertainment to food literacy education : an investigation into food media content, food media exposure, and food literacy among emerging adults

Teunissen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…interventions(Ul-Ain et al, 2022) Simeon et al (2020). reviewed reports of social media interventions to change health behaviors in adults and identified the top 15 BCTs applied across interactive social media.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

From food media entertainment to food literacy education : an investigation into food media content, food media exposure, and food literacy among emerging adults

Teunissen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Survivorship care in breast cancer: understanding implementation barriers through the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework

Brauer,

Petersen,

Ganz

2023

JNCI Cancer Spectrum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Breast cancer survivorship guidelines with specific recommendations on managing long-term effects are available, but uptake in clinical practice remains low. Using the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), we aimed to understand key factors in guideline-concordant management of long-term effects to inform future implementation efforts in clinical practice contexts. Methods As part of a broader survey of oncologists, a theoretically-guided questionnaire was developed. Oncologists were asked to report level of agreement with TDF-based statements, current usage and perceived value of survivorship resources, and frequency of managing long-term effects in routine care. Data analyses included psychometric assessment of the questionnaire, descriptive summaries of theoretical domains and survivorship resources, and multivariable logistic regression models. Results 217 oncologists completed the TDF-based questionnaire. Fifty-four percent of oncologists reported “always or almost always” evaluating physical effects at routine survivorship appointments, while 34% did so for psychosocial effects. In regression models, Environmental Context and Resources was the only theoretical domain found to be significantly associated with “always or almost always” evaluating both physical (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.09-0.80) and psychosocial (OR 0.09, 95% CI, 0.02-0.35) effects. Conclusions Findings support application of the TDF in understanding oncologists’ behaviors and perceived barriers in managing long-term effects in breast cancer survivors. In future implementation efforts, this theoretically-informed approach can be used to target relevant domains and strategies focused on embedding guideline recommendations into the clinical context through structured resources and environmental supports.

show abstract

Mapping Behavior Change Wheel Techniques to Digital Behavior Change Interventions: Review

Cited by 2 publications

References 59 publications

From food media entertainment to food literacy education : an investigation into food media content, food media exposure, and food literacy among emerging adults

From food media entertainment to food literacy education : an investigation into food media content, food media exposure, and food literacy among emerging adults

Survivorship care in breast cancer: understanding implementation barriers through the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About