Mapping B1-induced eddy current effects near metallic structures in MR images: A comparison of simulation and experiment

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the presence of metallic structures is very common in medical and non-medical fields. Metallic structures cause MRI image distortions by three mechanisms: (1) static field distortion through magnetic susceptibility mismatch, (2) eddy currents induced by switched magnetic field gradients and (3) radio frequency (RF) induced eddy currents. Single point ramped imaging with T1 enhancement (SPRITE) MRI measurements are largely immune to susceptibility and gradient induced eddy current artifacts. As a result, one can isolate the effects of metal objects on the RF field. The RF field affects both the excitation and detection of the magnetic resonance (MR) signal. This is challenging with conventional MRI methods, which cannot readily separate the three effects. RF induced MRI artifacts were investigated experimentally at 2.4 T by analyzing image distortions surrounding two geometrically identical metallic strips of aluminum and lead. The strips were immersed in agar gel doped with contrast agent and imaged employing the conical SPRITE sequence. B1 mapping with pure phase encode SPRITE was employed to measure the B1 field around the strips of metal. The strip geometry was chosen to mimic metal electrodes employed in electrochemistry studies. Simulations are employed to investigate the RF field induced eddy currents in the two metallic strips. The RF simulation results are in good agreement with experimental results. Experimental and simulation results show that the metal has a pronounced effect on the B1 distribution and B1 amplitude in the surrounding space. The electrical conductivity of the metal has a minimal effect.

Quantification of MRI visibility and artifacts at 3T of liquid fiducial marker in a pancreas tissue‐mimicking phantom

“…Possible signal alterations due to eddy currents or RF shielding induced in the solid markers were not considered. Given the size and composition of fiducial markers tested, this effect is expected to be secondary relative to the susceptibility induced reduction effect . Eddy currents resulting from changing RF field are, however, very likely the main source of the Gold Anchor™ signal voids observed in SE sequences (as seen in Fig.…”

Real-time 3D imaging of microstructure growth in battery cells using indirect MRI

“…Dirichlet boundary conditions were used on the surface of the sphere to specify the incoming field, H in 1 = ð0,1,0Þ, whereas perfect conductor boundary conditions were used on the surface of the dendrite. When using calculations with finite conductivity, the magnitude of an object's conductivity has a negligible effect on B 1 distortions (12,27). The computations were performed in the rotating frame at a frequency of 400 MHz (the Larmor frequency of 1 H in the MRI experiments) using the BiCGStab solver.…”

Quantitative assessment of biliary stent artifacts on MR images: Potential implications for target delineation in radiotherapy

“…These stents are known to cause artifacts 21,22 such as susceptibility artifacts, 23 gradient-induced artifacts, 24,25 and radio frequency (RF)induced artifacts (also known as RF-shielding). [26][27][28][29] As the stent is placed in the vicinity of the tumor, 30 MRI artifacts caused by these stents may hinder tumor delineation.…”