2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.20.558833
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping axon diameters and conduction velocity in the rat brain – different methods tell different stories of the structure-function relationship

Christian S. Skoven,
Mariam Andersson,
Marco Pizzolato
et al.

Abstract: We investigated the structure-function relationship of axons projecting through the corpus callosum. We measured transcallosal conduction times using optogenetically evoked local field potentials (LFP) and estimated conduction length with tractography based on ex vivo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Axon diameters were quantified using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dMRI. Comparing quantifications from TEM of dehydrated tissue with cryo-TEM, revealed axon diameter shrinkage in the form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polygons were all acquired at the magnification of 8500x. It is important to mention that resin-embedding can lead to the shrinkage in biological samples, potentially impacting the estimation of axonal diameters compared to those obtained in vivo or through alternative methods ( 52 ). However, for the purpose of this study, the relative difference of axonal diameters was the relevant quantity, not the absolute diameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polygons were all acquired at the magnification of 8500x. It is important to mention that resin-embedding can lead to the shrinkage in biological samples, potentially impacting the estimation of axonal diameters compared to those obtained in vivo or through alternative methods ( 52 ). However, for the purpose of this study, the relative difference of axonal diameters was the relevant quantity, not the absolute diameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%