2020
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1815864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and prediction of soil organic carbon by an advanced geostatistical technique using remote sensing and terrain data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By dividing the data set, the method allows modelling the relationship between precipitation and co-variable and to capture the nonstationary of precipitation. The biggest advantage compared with classical kriging is that EBKR takes in consideration the semi variogram error (Santanu et al 2020). The weight of each semi variogram is calculated according to Bayes theorem (Yuanpei et al 2016).…”
Section: Ebkrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By dividing the data set, the method allows modelling the relationship between precipitation and co-variable and to capture the nonstationary of precipitation. The biggest advantage compared with classical kriging is that EBKR takes in consideration the semi variogram error (Santanu et al 2020). The weight of each semi variogram is calculated according to Bayes theorem (Yuanpei et al 2016).…”
Section: Ebkrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arti cial neural network (ANN) is a non-linear supervised deep learning method, which tends to mimic the human brain and biological nervous system (Amanollahi and Ausati, 2020;Ordieres et al, 2005;Yao et al, 2012). The capability of learning a complex relationship problem between input and output parameters makes the ANN model more exible and more usable in many multidisciplinary elds (Emamgholizadeh et al 2017;Mallik et al 2020).…”
Section: Arti Cial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported that hybrid models improve prediction accuracy (Dai et al 2014;Mirzaee et al 2016;Tziachris et al 2019;Matinfar et al 2021). However, few studies have been conducted on the performance of EBKRP over machine-learning approaches (Requia et al 2019;Mallik et al 2020). Speci cally, no well-documented studies have reported the prediction performance of EBKRP, RF, and the hybrid methods of RF-EBKRP for the spatial prediction of PTEs in the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%