2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.96.042304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and discrimination of networks in the complexity-entropy plane

Abstract: Complex networks are usually characterized in terms of their topological, spatial, or informationtheoretic properties and combinations of the associated metrics are used to discriminate networks into different classes or categories. However, even with the present variety of characteristics at hand it still remains a subject of current research to appropriately quantify a network's complexity and correspondingly discriminate between different types of complex networks, like infrastructure or social networks, on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(107 reference statements)
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In many real-world complex networks nodes are placed in a metric space and are therefore characterized by a specific location [10][11][12]. Hence, an increasing number of studies has discussed the properties of such spatially embedded networks [13][14][15][16]. Specifically, different measures have been proposed for complementing topological information by considering the spatial coordinates of nodes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many real-world complex networks nodes are placed in a metric space and are therefore characterized by a specific location [10][11][12]. Hence, an increasing number of studies has discussed the properties of such spatially embedded networks [13][14][15][16]. Specifically, different measures have been proposed for complementing topological information by considering the spatial coordinates of nodes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thus obtained, which we refer to as a functional climate network, therefore obeys a link density of ρ = 5%, which is a common choice for this type of analysis (e.g. Malik et al, 2012;Wiedermann et al, 2017).…”
Section: Functional Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For global networks with a comparable resolution, this order of magnitude has been a common choice in previous studies (Radebach et al, 2013;Donner et al, 2017). It has to be noted, however, that changes in the link density of a climate network have been previously shown to potentially result in qualitatively different behaviors of the resulting network characteristics (Radebach et al, 2013;Wiedermann et al, 2017) (depending on the specific network property under study). For this reason, we keep the link density fixed for all analyses performed in this work.…”
Section: Functional Climate Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%