2015
DOI: 10.1167/15.12.781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and Correcting the Influence of Gaze Position on Pupil Size Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure reliable measurements of pupil diameter that were not influenced by changes in eye position (Hayes and Petrov, 2015), we included for analysis only periods of fixation that started at least 1 s after fixation onset and did not include any saccadic events, defined as changes in eye position with a minimum distance = 0.2 deg, minimum peak velocity = 0.08 deg/ms, minimum instantaneous velocity = 0.04 deg/ms, and minimum instantaneous acceleration = 0.005 deg/ms 2 . Eye position was highly stable during these epochs (Mann-Whitney test for H 0 : no difference in eye position at the beginning versus end of each fixation epoch, p >0.05 for 294/306 sessions across all monkeys).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure reliable measurements of pupil diameter that were not influenced by changes in eye position (Hayes and Petrov, 2015), we included for analysis only periods of fixation that started at least 1 s after fixation onset and did not include any saccadic events, defined as changes in eye position with a minimum distance = 0.2 deg, minimum peak velocity = 0.08 deg/ms, minimum instantaneous velocity = 0.04 deg/ms, and minimum instantaneous acceleration = 0.005 deg/ms 2 . Eye position was highly stable during these epochs (Mann-Whitney test for H 0 : no difference in eye position at the beginning versus end of each fixation epoch, p >0.05 for 294/306 sessions across all monkeys).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, only some vendors provide a pupil size signal that compensates for errors associated with eccentric gaze angles (pupil foreshortening error, PSE). Relative to central fixation, PSE increases as viewing distance gets shorter and gaze angle increases (61). PSE can exceed 14% of the measured pupil size under typical experimental conditions, so correction may be necessary (61).…”
Section: Measuring Affective Influences On Pupil Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to central fixation, PSE increases as viewing distance gets shorter and gaze angle increases (61). PSE can exceed 14% of the measured pupil size under typical experimental conditions, so correction may be necessary (61). …”
Section: Measuring Affective Influences On Pupil Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there is evidence that the pupillary light reflex can be artificially induced in the condition of constant luminance by showing pictures that suggest brightness, for instance by contrasting images of the sun and the moon (Binda, Pereverzeva, & Murray, ; Laeng & Endestad, ; Naber & Nakayama, ). Another potential confound that has to be accounted for is that the pupil size can vary due to participants’ gaze position (see Hayes & Petrov, ; Scheepers & Crocker, ). Finally, it is important to note that pupil response is relatively slow to return to baseline (Schmidtke, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%