2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-iii-8-109-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping and Change Analysis in Mangrove Forest by Using Landsat Imagery

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Mangrove is located in the tropical and subtropical regions and brings good services for native people. Mangrove in the world has been lost with a rapid rate. Therefore, monitoring a spatiotemporal distribution of mangrove is thus critical for natural resource management. This research objectives were: (i) to map the current extent of mangrove in the West and Central Africa and in the Sundarbans delta, and (ii) to identify change of mangrove using Landsat data. The data were processed through four mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification result in this study is acceptable to compare with other previous studies (e.g. Dan et al, 2016;Tieng et al, 2019;Hai-Hoa et al, 2020b). A similar ISODATA clustering method was applied to classify mangrove forests in Philippines and the classification accuracy reached 96.6%, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.926 (Long and Giri, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification result in this study is acceptable to compare with other previous studies (e.g. Dan et al, 2016;Tieng et al, 2019;Hai-Hoa et al, 2020b). A similar ISODATA clustering method was applied to classify mangrove forests in Philippines and the classification accuracy reached 96.6%, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.926 (Long and Giri, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Especially, the overall map accuracy was 80.0% (Table 4) with the Kappa coefficient of 0.74. This coefficient indicates that there is a substantial agreement between data collected from the field survey and the results-derived Landsat-8 image classification (Malarvizhi et al, 2016;Dan et al, 2016). During accuracy assessments, mapping accuracy might be affected by possible mixed-pixel issues, tidal regime and cloud cover percentage (Hai-Hoa et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessments Of Land Use and Land Cover Mappingmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall accuracy of the classified maps for 2015 and 2020 were 90.33% and 93.00%, respectively, and the kappa coefficient were 0.81 and 0.86, respectively (Table 1). These accuracy metrics showed an acceptable agreement between the classification results and reference data (Dan et al, 2016;Thomas et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The producer and user's accuracies of other land use were lower than the other classes, which could be due to spectral similarity between other land uses (such as rice fields) and other forests. However, the kappa coefficient was 0.97 (Table 4), showing that there was a substantial agreement between the classification results and reference data [83,84,115].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%