Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements and Youth Justice
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9qgt11.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mappa:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Programme practitioners reported linking into one or both of two formal multi-agency responses which operate throughout England and Wales at the time of writing. Some men – but not all – were incorporated into the local Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPAs) (see Kemshall et al, 2005; Maguire et al, 2001 for more detail). WSWs reported that they might feed into these be it through providing information or (in some cases) attending meetings.…”
Section: Multiagency Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programme practitioners reported linking into one or both of two formal multi-agency responses which operate throughout England and Wales at the time of writing. Some men – but not all – were incorporated into the local Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPAs) (see Kemshall et al, 2005; Maguire et al, 2001 for more detail). WSWs reported that they might feed into these be it through providing information or (in some cases) attending meetings.…”
Section: Multiagency Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MAPPA, serious violent and sexual offenders are often jointly managed by the police and probation services (e.g. Kemshall et al, 2005). In both cases a wide definition of the policing task is used.…”
Section: What Were the Expanded State Police Doing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MoJ, 2007, 2012) and subsequent evaluations of the public protection arrangements have been conducted which outline the risk management procedures used in relation to RSOs (e.g. Kemshall et al, 2005; Maguire et al, 2001; Wood and Kemshall, 2007; see also Kemshall, 2008; Wood and Kemshall, 2008). An area of concern that has been given increasing recognition is the need for consistency in practice across the different 42 MAPPA areas in England and Wales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2. MAPPA was introduced into legislation through the Criminal Justice and Courts Service Act (CJCSA) 2000 and Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 2003. These arrangements have been subject to research evaluations (Kemshall et al, 2005; Maguire et al, 2001; Wood and Kemshall, 2007) and guidance (see, for example, Home Office, 2003, 2004, 2007; MoJ, 2007, 2012). MAPPA involves a tiered system of risk management of registered sexual offenders (category 1), violent offenders (category 2) and ‘other dangerous offenders’ (category 3) at Level 1 (low/medium risk), Level 2 (high risk) or Level 3 (critical risk).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%