2004
DOI: 10.18867/ris.71.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapas De Velocidad Máxima Del Suelo Para La Ciudad De México

Abstract: El objetivo de este artículo es presentar los mapas de distribución de velocidad máxima del suelo de la Ciudad de México para cuatro eventos sísmicos de interés. Se describe el procedimiento de cálculo, el programa de computadora empleado y su calibración, la cual permite que los valores de velocidad calculados se aproximen a los medidos. Además, se propone un grupo de ecuaciones de ajuste, en función de la magnitud del evento, con el propósito de calcular mapas de velocidades para sismos postulados. Finalment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the uncertainty in the damage estimation for the MCWS, in this study only two fragility functions Ordaz, 2003 and2007) are used to estimate the damage in the pipeline system. Pineda and Ordaz (2003) proposed a fragility formulation for buried pipelines employing the 1985 damage scenario published by Ayala and O'Rourke M. (1989), and the detailed maps for Mexico City proposed by Pineda and Ordaz (2004). In order to analyze the variability of the relationship between damage rates (rep/km) and PGV for several ranges of seismic intensity, nine scenarios were used to generate a PGV-based fragility function.…”
Section: Seismic Fragility Functions Based On the 1985 Mcws Damage Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the uncertainty in the damage estimation for the MCWS, in this study only two fragility functions Ordaz, 2003 and2007) are used to estimate the damage in the pipeline system. Pineda and Ordaz (2003) proposed a fragility formulation for buried pipelines employing the 1985 damage scenario published by Ayala and O'Rourke M. (1989), and the detailed maps for Mexico City proposed by Pineda and Ordaz (2004). In order to analyze the variability of the relationship between damage rates (rep/km) and PGV for several ranges of seismic intensity, nine scenarios were used to generate a PGV-based fragility function.…”
Section: Seismic Fragility Functions Based On the 1985 Mcws Damage Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragility functions previously proposed for the MCWS are further described below. Pineda and Ordaz (2003) proposed a fragility formulation for buried pipelines employing the 1985 damage scenario published by Ayala and O'Rourke (1989), and the detailed PGV maps for Mexico City proposed by Pineda and Ordaz (2004). In order to analyze the variability of the RR -PGV data points for several ranges of seismic intensity, nine scenarios were used to generate the fragility function shown in Equation 6, where <l> is the cumulative normal function (CNF), shown in Equation 7.…”
Section: Rr 724and°•92mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En su mayoría, los estudios mencionados para estimar el peligro o la vulnerabilidad sísmica del área metropolitana de la Ciudad de México se basan en parámetros elásticos (Gómez-Bernal et al 1991, Pérez-Rocha 1998, Reinoso y Ordaz 1999, Huerta y Reinoso 2002, Pineda y Ordaz 2004. Los únicos estudios que consideran parámetros con base en respuestas inelásticas son los desarrollados por Gómez-Bernal et al (1991) y Huerta y Reinoso (2002).…”
Section: Estudios Previosunclassified