2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAP storage of shell hen eggs, Part 1: Effect on physico-chemical characteristics of the fresh product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant different weight loss was registered comparing 100% CO 2 packed eggs and unpacked eggs (1.5 vs 7%). The results on unpacked eggs confirm previous experiments showing a weight loss in a range of 6-10% (Caner, 2005;Rocculi et al, 2009). In packed eggs the values reported in the present study are slightly higher than those previously reported [1.5% this study vs 0.5% Rocculi et al (2009)].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A significant different weight loss was registered comparing 100% CO 2 packed eggs and unpacked eggs (1.5 vs 7%). The results on unpacked eggs confirm previous experiments showing a weight loss in a range of 6-10% (Caner, 2005;Rocculi et al, 2009). In packed eggs the values reported in the present study are slightly higher than those previously reported [1.5% this study vs 0.5% Rocculi et al (2009)].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In packed eggs the values reported in the present study are slightly higher than those previously reported [1.5% this study vs 0.5% Rocculi et al (2009)]. Differences in weight loss between studies may be due to the storage conditions, temperature, egg size and shell porosity as well as, for packed eggs, inclusion of moisture adsorbent (Bhale et al, 2003;Caner, 2005;Rocculi et al, 2009;Pasquali et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different studies (Cotterill & Gardner, 1956;Moran, 1937;Romanoff & Romanoff, 1949;Keener, LaCrosse, Curtis, Anderson, & Farkas, 2000b;Rocculi et al, 2009) suggest to store the eggs in an atmosphere enriched in CO 2 or to cool shell eggs using cryogenic CO 2 to preserve the egg quality and to improve the functional properties of its constituents. These new conservation techniques may be efficiently studied, developing specific simulation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%