2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Map Making: Constructing, Combining, and Inferring on Abstract Cognitive Maps

Abstract: Highlights d Human brains map abstract relationships among entities from piecemeal learning d Separately learnt dimensions are combined and represented in a 2D social hierarchy d To make novel inferences, HC reinstates a hub that connects two social hierarchies d EC and vmPFC encode Euclidean distances of inferred vectors for novel inferences

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
156
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
14
156
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We reported the results corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain using TFCE (Smith and Nichols, 2009) with 1000 iterations of simulation (pTFCE<0.05). In addition, because we hypothesized that that cognitive map representations would be found in HC and EC based on prior studies (O' Keefe and Nadel, 1978;Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2014;Park et al, 2020;Whittington et al, 2020), we report results in the HC and EC corrected in the anatomically defined ROI, (Amunts et al, 2005;Zilles and Amunts, 2010;Yushkevich et al, 2015) which is independent of the current study (pTFCE<0.05).…”
Section: Searchlight-based Rsamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We reported the results corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain using TFCE (Smith and Nichols, 2009) with 1000 iterations of simulation (pTFCE<0.05). In addition, because we hypothesized that that cognitive map representations would be found in HC and EC based on prior studies (O' Keefe and Nadel, 1978;Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2014;Park et al, 2020;Whittington et al, 2020), we report results in the HC and EC corrected in the anatomically defined ROI, (Amunts et al, 2005;Zilles and Amunts, 2010;Yushkevich et al, 2015) which is independent of the current study (pTFCE<0.05).…”
Section: Searchlight-based Rsamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…These ideas are supported by findings that neural representations in MTL, as well as medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), are involved in "navigation" of simple two-dimensional spaces of visual stimuli (Constantinescu et al, 2016;Theves et al, 2019Theves et al, , 2020, social spaces (Park et al, 2020;Tavares et al, 2015) and odor spaces (Bao et al, 2019). A recent study in the Journal of Neuroscience (Viganò & Piazza, 2020) takes this research further by suggesting that entorhinal cortex (EHC) and mPFC are capable of mapping not only sensory spaces, but also abstract semantic spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These ideas are supported by findings that neural representations in the MTL, as well as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), are involved in “navigation” of simple two-dimensional spaces of visual stimuli (Constantinescu et al, 2016 ; Theves et al, 2019 , 2020 ), social spaces (Tavares et al, 2015 ; Park et al, 2020 ), and odor spaces (Bao et al, 2019 ). A recent study in the Journal of Neuroscience (Viganò and Piazza, 2020 ) takes this research further by suggesting that the entorhinal cortex (EHC) and the mPFC are capable of mapping not only sensory spaces, but also abstract semantic spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%